BBBL vs. TLH
BBBL (Bondbloxx BBB Rated 10+ Year Corporate Bond ETF) and TLH (iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBBL is a Long-Term Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Corporate BBB 10+ Year Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while TLH is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 10-20 Year Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BBBL returned 6.99% vs 4.09% for TLH. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BBBL charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for TLH.
Performance
BBBL vs. TLH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBBL achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly higher than TLH's -0.33% return.
BBBL
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 1.28%
- YTD
- 1.50%
- 6M
- 0.79%
- 1Y
- 6.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TLH
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- -0.33%
- 6M
- -0.83%
- 1Y
- 4.09%
- 3Y*
- 0.67%
- 5Y*
- -3.77%
- 10Y*
- -0.78%
BBBL vs. TLH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BBBL Bondbloxx BBB Rated 10+ Year Corporate Bond ETF | 1.50% | 7.02% | 0.89% |
TLH iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF | -0.33% | 6.47% | -0.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBBL and TLH is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2024 | 0.91 |
The correlation between BBBL and TLH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBBL vs. TLH — Risk / Return Rank
BBBL
TLH
BBBL vs. TLH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bondbloxx BBB Rated 10+ Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBL) and iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BBBL | TLH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.09 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 0.63 | +0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.23 | 1.74 | +1.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BBBL | TLH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 | 0.52 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.07 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.28 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
BBBL vs. TLH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBBL drawdown since its inception was -9.43%, smaller than the maximum TLH drawdown of -41.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBBL and TLH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBBL | TLH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.43% | -41.14% | +31.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.45% | -6.50% | +1.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.62% | -29.69% | +28.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.30% | -10.76% | +7.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.17% | 2.36% | -0.19% |
Volatility
BBBL vs. TLH - Volatility Comparison
Bondbloxx BBB Rated 10+ Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBL) and iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLH) have volatilities of 2.39% and 2.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBBL | TLH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.39% | 2.43% | -0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.75% | 5.49% | +0.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.86% | 8.01% | -0.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.80% | 12.69% | -2.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.80% | 11.19% | -1.39% |
BBBL vs. TLH - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBBL has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than TLH's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BBBL vs. TLH - Dividend Comparison
BBBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.72%, more than TLH's 4.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBBL Bondbloxx BBB Rated 10+ Year Corporate Bond ETF | 5.72% | 5.77% | 5.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TLH iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF | 4.47% | 4.17% | 4.28% | 3.83% | 2.78% | 1.50% | 2.65% | 2.31% | 2.17% | 1.83% | 1.91% | 2.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, BBBL and TLH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
TLH has higher volatility (2.43%) compared to BBBL (2.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBBL dropped -9.43% vs TLH's -41.14%.
On 1-year performance, BBBL leads with 6.99% vs 4.09% for TLH. On fees, TLH is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BBBL has performed better with a 6.99% return vs 4.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TLH is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for BBBL.
BBBL has the higher dividend yield at 5.72%, compared with 4.47% for TLH.
BBBL is categorized as Long-Term Bond, while TLH is Government Bonds. BBBL tracks Bloomberg U.S. Corporate BBB 10+ Year Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while TLH tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 10-20 Year Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for BBBL and 0.15% for TLH.
BBBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.90 vs 0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBBL and TLH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer