BBBL vs. PIT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BBBL (Bondbloxx BBB Rated 10+ Year Corporate Bond ETF) and PIT (VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBBL is a Long-Term Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Corporate BBB 10+ Year Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while PIT is a Commodities fund actively managed by VanEck. BBBL is passively managed, while PIT is actively managed. Over the past year, BBBL returned 6.49% vs 39.64% for PIT. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. BBBL charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for PIT.

Performance

BBBL vs. PIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bondbloxx BBB Rated 10+ Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBL) and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBBL achieves a 1.71% return, which is significantly lower than PIT's 25.62% return.

BBBL

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 1.57%
• YTD: 1.71%
• 6M: 1.55%
• 1Y: 6.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PIT

• 1D: -1.32%
• 1M: -11.78%
• YTD: 25.62%
• 6M: 23.58%
• 1Y: 39.64%
• 3Y*: 18.98%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBBL vs. PIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BBBL Bondbloxx BBB Rated 10+ Year Corporate Bond ETF	1.71%	7.02%	0.93%
PIT VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF	25.62%	21.63%	4.33%

Correlation

The correlation between BBBL and PIT is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2024	-0.12

The correlation between BBBL and PIT shifts across timeframes, from -0.27 (1 year) to -0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BBBL vs. PIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBBL

BBBL Risk / Return Rank: 24
BBBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
BBBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
BBBL Omega Ratio Rank: 23
BBBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
BBBL Martin Ratio Rank: 24

PIT

PIT Risk / Return Rank: 57
PIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
PIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
PIT Omega Ratio Rank: 56
PIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
PIT Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBBL vs. PIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bondbloxx BBB Rated 10+ Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBL) and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BBBL	PIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.84	1.85	-1.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.24	2.40	-1.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.33	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.20	2.62	-1.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.95	10.88	-7.93

BBBL vs. PIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBBL Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the PIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBBL and PIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BBBL vs. PIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBBL drawdown since its inception was -9.43%, smaller than the maximum PIT drawdown of -15.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBBL and PIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBBL	PIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.43%	-15.19%	+5.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.45%	-15.19%	+9.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.19%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.41%	-15.19%	+13.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.27%	-4.08%	+0.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.20%	3.66%	-1.46%

Volatility

BBBL vs. PIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bondbloxx BBB Rated 10+ Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBL) is 1.90%, while VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT) has a volatility of 4.72%. This indicates that BBBL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BBBL	PIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.90%	4.72%	-2.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.80%	19.40%	-13.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.77%	21.66%	-13.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.75%	17.50%	-7.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.75%	17.50%	-7.75%

BBBL vs. PIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBBL has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than PIT's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

BBBL vs. PIT - Dividend Comparison

BBBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.71%, less than PIT's 7.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BBBL Bondbloxx BBB Rated 10+ Year Corporate Bond ETF	5.71%	5.77%	5.19%	0.00%
PIT VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF	7.10%	8.92%	3.59%	6.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBBL and PIT in my portfolio?

BBBL and PIT have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BBBL or PIT?

PIT has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to BBBL (1.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBBL dropped -9.43% vs PIT's -15.19%.

Which ETF is better, BBBL or PIT?

On 1-year performance, PIT leads with 39.64% vs 6.49% for BBBL. On fees, BBBL is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, BBBL has been the lower-risk option at 1.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BBBL or PIT?

Over the 1-year period, PIT has performed better with a 39.64% return vs 6.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BBBL or PIT?

BBBL is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PIT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BBBL or PIT?

PIT has the higher dividend yield at 7.10%, compared with 5.71% for BBBL.

What is the main difference between BBBL and PIT?

BBBL is categorized as Long-Term Bond, while PIT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for BBBL and 0.55% for PIT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.