PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBBL vs. HYSA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBBL vs. HYSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bondbloxx BBB Rated 10+ Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBL) and Bondbloxx USD High Yield Bond Sector Rotation ETF (HYSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBBL achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly higher than HYSA's 1.26% return.


BBBL

1D
0.27%
1M
1.28%
YTD
1.50%
6M
0.79%
1Y
6.99%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HYSA

1D
0.19%
1M
0.40%
YTD
1.26%
6M
1.49%
1Y
6.36%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBBL vs. HYSA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BBBL and HYSA is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2024

0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBBL vs. HYSA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBBL
BBBL Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
BBBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBBL Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
BBBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBBL Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

HYSA
HYSA Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
HYSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYSA Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
HYSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYSA Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBBL vs. HYSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bondbloxx BBB Rated 10+ Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBL) and Bondbloxx USD High Yield Bond Sector Rotation ETF (HYSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBBLHYSADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.25

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.29

2.03

-0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.23

8.16

-4.93

BBBL vs. HYSA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBBL Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is lower than the HYSA Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBBL and HYSA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBBLHYSADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

1.37

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

1.37

-0.97

Drawdowns

BBBL vs. HYSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBBL drawdown since its inception was -9.43%, which is greater than HYSA's maximum drawdown of -4.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBBL and HYSA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBBLHYSADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.43%

-4.90%

-4.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.45%

-3.15%

-2.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.62%

-0.27%

-1.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.30%

-0.68%

-2.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.17%

0.78%

+1.39%

Volatility

BBBL vs. HYSA - Volatility Comparison

Bondbloxx BBB Rated 10+ Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBL) has a higher volatility of 2.39% compared to Bondbloxx USD High Yield Bond Sector Rotation ETF (HYSA) at 1.28%. This indicates that BBBL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBBLHYSADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.39%

1.28%

+1.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.75%

3.55%

+2.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.86%

4.68%

+3.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.80%

6.08%

+3.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.80%

6.08%

+3.72%

BBBL vs. HYSA - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBBL has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than HYSA's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

BBBL vs. HYSA - Dividend Comparison

BBBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.72%, less than HYSA's 6.76% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BBBL
Bondbloxx BBB Rated 10+ Year Corporate Bond ETF
5.72%5.77%5.19%0.00%
HYSA
Bondbloxx USD High Yield Bond Sector Rotation ETF
6.76%6.70%6.99%2.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBBL and HYSA have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBBL has higher volatility (2.39%) compared to HYSA (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBBL dropped -9.43% vs HYSA's -4.90%.

On 1-year performance, BBBL leads with 6.99% vs 6.36% for HYSA. On fees, BBBL is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, HYSA has been the lower-risk option at 1.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BBBL has performed better with a 6.99% return vs 6.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBBL is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for HYSA.

HYSA has the higher dividend yield at 6.76%, compared with 5.72% for BBBL.

BBBL is categorized as Long-Term Bond, while HYSA is High Yield Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for BBBL and 0.55% for HYSA.

HYSA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBBL and HYSA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer