PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBB vs. WNTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBB vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Bitcoin 75/25 Strategy ETF (BBB) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBB achieves a -3.04% return, which is significantly lower than WNTR's 10.46% return.


BBB

1D
-1.20%
1M
-6.29%
YTD
-3.04%
6M
-3.82%
1Y
1.52%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

WNTR

1D
6.01%
1M
37.47%
YTD
10.46%
6M
14.06%
1Y
97.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBB vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BBB and WNTR is -0.74, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025

-0.72

The correlation between BBB and WNTR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.74 to -0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBB vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBB
BBB Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
BBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBB Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
BBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBB Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

WNTR
WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBB vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Bitcoin 75/25 Strategy ETF (BBB) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BBBWNTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.30

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.09

2.29

-2.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.21

5.85

-5.63

BBB vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBB Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is lower than the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBB and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BBB vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBB drawdown since its inception was -21.98%, smaller than the maximum WNTR drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBB and WNTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBBWNTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.98%

-42.65%

+20.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.74%

-42.65%

+24.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.91%

-9.88%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.49%

-20.93%

+16.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.19%

16.70%

-9.51%

Volatility

BBB vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Bitcoin 75/25 Strategy ETF (BBB) is 5.61%, while YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a volatility of 17.54%. This indicates that BBB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBBWNTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.61%

17.54%

-11.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.77%

45.99%

-32.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.01%

52.83%

-34.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.03%

53.10%

-31.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.03%

53.10%

-31.07%

BBB vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBB has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

BBB vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

BBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than WNTR's 96.66% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


BBB and WNTR have a correlation of -0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WNTR has higher volatility (17.54%) compared to BBB (5.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBB dropped -21.98% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 97.02% vs 1.52% for BBB. On fees, BBB is cheaper at 0.98% per year. On volatility, BBB has been the lower-risk option at 5.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 97.02% return vs 1.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBB is cheaper with a 0.98% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WNTR.

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 96.66%, compared with 0.22% for BBB.

BBB is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: CYBER HORNET and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for BBB and 1.01% for WNTR.

WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBB and WNTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer