BBAX vs. JCPB
BBAX (JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF) and JCPB (JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBAX is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Developed Asia Pacific ex-Japan Target Market Exposure Index, while JCPB is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by JPMorgan. BBAX is passively managed, while JCPB is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, BBAX returned 5.02%/yr vs 1.11%/yr for JCPB. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BBAX charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for JCPB.
Performance
BBAX vs. JCPB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBAX achieves a 10.52% return, which is significantly higher than JCPB's 0.58% return.
BBAX
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- 1.03%
- YTD
- 10.52%
- 6M
- 12.09%
- 1Y
- 20.17%
- 3Y*
- 13.06%
- 5Y*
- 5.02%
- 10Y*
- —
JCPB
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 0.58%
- 6M
- 0.54%
- 1Y
- 6.11%
- 3Y*
- 5.02%
- 5Y*
- 1.11%
- 10Y*
- —
BBAX vs. JCPB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBAX JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF | 10.52% | 20.21% | 2.50% | 5.60% | -4.80% | 5.53% | 8.02% | 10.89% |
JCPB JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF | 0.58% | 7.98% | 2.96% | 7.13% | -12.90% | -0.51% | 9.19% | 7.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBAX and JCPB is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2019 | 0.18 |
Over the past year, BBAX and JCPB have become more correlated (0.41) than their long-term average of 0.18, meaning their price movements have been converging.
BBAX vs. JCPB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BBAX
JCPB
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Technology
Financial Services
BBAX
JCPB
Basic Materials
BBAX
JCPB
Real Estate
BBAX
JCPB
Industrials
BBAX
JCPB
Consumer Cyclical
BBAX
JCPB
Healthcare
BBAX
JCPB
Utilities
BBAX
JCPB
Consumer Defensive
BBAX
JCPB
Energy
BBAX
JCPB
Communication Services
BBAX
JCPB
Technology
BBAX
JCPB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBAX vs. JCPB — Risk / Return Rank
BBAX
JCPB
BBAX vs. JCPB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF (BBAX) and JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF (JCPB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BBAX | JCPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.41 | 1.63 | -0.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.00 | 2.42 | -0.42 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.29 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.25 | 2.26 | -0.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.46 | 6.88 | +0.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BBAX | JCPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.41 | 1.63 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.21 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.55 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
BBAX vs. JCPB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBAX drawdown since its inception was -39.64%, which is greater than JCPB's maximum drawdown of -16.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBAX and JCPB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBAX | JCPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.64% | -16.67% | -22.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.01% | -2.71% | -6.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.12% | -5.97% | -14.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.33% | -16.67% | -7.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.16% | -1.48% | -1.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.22% | -4.26% | -2.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.71% | 0.89% | +1.82% |
Volatility
BBAX vs. JCPB - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF (BBAX) has a higher volatility of 4.65% compared to JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF (JCPB) at 1.26%. This indicates that BBAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JCPB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBAX | JCPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.65% | 1.26% | +3.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.79% | 2.72% | +9.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.34% | 3.77% | +10.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.28% | 5.38% | +11.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.68% | 5.05% | +14.63% |
BBAX vs. JCPB - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBAX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than JCPB's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
BBAX vs. JCPB - Dividend Comparison
BBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%, less than JCPB's 4.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBAX JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF | 3.58% | 3.86% | 4.13% | 4.17% | 5.06% | 5.47% | 2.57% | 4.07% | 1.36% |
JCPB JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF | 4.93% | 4.90% | 5.16% | 4.32% | 3.01% | 2.19% | 2.97% | 3.01% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BBAX and JCPB have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BBAX has higher volatility (4.65%) compared to JCPB (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBAX dropped -39.64% vs JCPB's -16.67%.
On 5-year performance, BBAX leads with 5.02% vs 1.11% for JCPB. On fees, BBAX is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, JCPB has been the lower-risk option at 1.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BBAX has performed better with a 5.02% return vs 1.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBAX is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for JCPB.
JCPB has the higher dividend yield at 4.93%, compared with 3.58% for BBAX.
BBAX is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while JCPB is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for BBAX and 0.38% for JCPB.
JCPB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBAX and JCPB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer