BBAX vs. GIND

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BBAX (JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF) and GIND (Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds. BBAX is passively managed, while GIND is actively managed. Over the past year, BBAX returned 20.17% vs -13.09% for GIND. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BBAX charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GIND.

Performance

BBAX vs. GIND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF (BBAX) and Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF (GIND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBAX achieves a 10.52% return, which is significantly higher than GIND's -11.06% return.

BBAX

• 1D: -1.00%
• 1M: 1.03%
• YTD: 10.52%
• 6M: 12.09%
• 1Y: 20.17%
• 3Y*: 13.06%
• 5Y*: 5.02%
• 10Y*: —

GIND

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: -1.64%
• YTD: -11.06%
• 6M: -10.81%
• 1Y: -13.09%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBAX vs. GIND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BBAX JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF	10.52%	19.92%
GIND Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF	-11.06%	4.55%

Correlation

The correlation between BBAX and GIND is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025	0.46

BBAX vs. GIND - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BBAX	GIND
Financial Services	45.9%	28.9%
Basic Materials	16.0%	9.2%
Real Estate	8.4%	2.2%
Industrials	7.9%	10.7%
Consumer Cyclical	4.9%	15.9%
Healthcare	4.5%	8.8%
Utilities	3.3%	2.9%
Consumer Defensive	3.1%	5.7%
Energy	2.9%	4.1%
Communication Services	2.8%	2.8%
Technology	0.3%	9.0%

Return for Risk

BBAX vs. GIND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBAX

BBAX Risk / Return Rank: 41
BBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
BBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
BBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 38
BBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
BBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 45

GIND

GIND Risk / Return Rank: 3
GIND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
GIND Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
GIND Omega Ratio Rank: 3
GIND Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
GIND Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBAX vs. GIND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF (BBAX) and Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF (GIND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BBAX	GIND	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.41	-0.81	+2.23
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.00	-1.12	+3.12
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	0.87	+0.38
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.25	-0.56	+2.81
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.46	-1.37	+8.83
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BBAX vs. GIND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is higher than the GIND Sharpe Ratio of -0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBAX and GIND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BBAX	GIND	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.41	-0.81	+2.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.35	-0.36	+0.70

Drawdowns

BBAX vs. GIND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBAX drawdown since its inception was -39.64%, which is greater than GIND's maximum drawdown of -22.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBAX and GIND.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBAX	GIND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.64%	-22.97%	-16.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.01%	-22.97%	+13.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.12%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.33%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.16%	-15.68%	+12.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.22%	-6.81%	-0.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.71%	9.46%	-6.75%

Volatility

BBAX vs. GIND - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF (BBAX) is 4.65%, while Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF (GIND) has a volatility of 5.66%. This indicates that BBAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GIND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BBAX	GIND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.65%	5.66%	-1.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.79%	13.98%	-2.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.34%	16.17%	-1.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.28%	17.10%	+0.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.68%	17.10%	+2.58%

BBAX vs. GIND - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBAX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than GIND's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

BBAX vs. GIND - Dividend Comparison

BBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%, while GIND has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BBAX JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF	3.58%	3.86%	4.13%	4.17%	5.06%	5.47%	2.57%	4.07%	1.36%
GIND Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBAX and GIND in my portfolio?

BBAX and GIND have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BBAX or GIND?

GIND has higher volatility (5.66%) compared to BBAX (4.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBAX dropped -39.64% vs GIND's -22.97%.

Which ETF is better, BBAX or GIND?

On 1-year performance, BBAX leads with 20.17% vs -13.09% for GIND. On fees, BBAX is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, BBAX has been the lower-risk option at 4.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BBAX or GIND?

Over the 1-year period, BBAX has performed better with a 20.17% return vs -13.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BBAX or GIND?

BBAX is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GIND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BBAX or GIND?

BBAX has the higher dividend yield at 3.58%, compared with 0.00% for GIND.

What is the main difference between BBAX and GIND?

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for BBAX and 0.75% for GIND.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.