PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REN.AS vs. UNA.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

REN.AS vs. UNA.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Relx PLC (REN.AS) and Unilever PLC (UNA.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REN.AS achieves a -12.29% return, which is significantly higher than UNA.AS's -13.88% return.


REN.AS

1D
5.29%
1M
-1.88%
YTD
-12.29%
6M
-12.60%
1Y
-35.67%
3Y*
1.92%
5Y*
8.88%
10Y*
9.22%

UNA.AS

1D
-1.15%
1M
-4.13%
YTD
-13.88%
6M
-7.14%
1Y
-12.81%
3Y*
3.22%
5Y*
2.52%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REN.AS vs. UNA.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
REN.AS
Relx PLC
-12.29%-19.36%24.23%41.60%-7.46%45.84%2.96%
UNA.AS
Unilever PLC
-13.88%3.73%29.86%-2.64%3.83%-1.17%3.26%

Correlation

The correlation between REN.AS and UNA.AS is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2020

0.33

Over the past year, the correlation between REN.AS and UNA.AS has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.33, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REN.AS vs. UNA.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REN.AS
REN.AS Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
REN.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REN.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
REN.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
REN.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
REN.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

UNA.AS
UNA.AS Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
UNA.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UNA.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
UNA.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
UNA.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
UNA.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REN.AS vs. UNA.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Relx PLC (REN.AS) and Unilever PLC (UNA.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


REN.ASUNA.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.79

0.89

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.70

-0.53

-0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.31

-1.23

-0.08

REN.AS vs. UNA.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REN.AS Sharpe Ratio is -1.13, which is lower than the UNA.AS Sharpe Ratio of -0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REN.AS and UNA.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


REN.ASUNA.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.13

-0.71

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.14

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.18

+0.11

Drawdowns

REN.AS vs. UNA.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REN.AS drawdown since its inception was -76.95%, which is greater than UNA.AS's maximum drawdown of -23.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REN.AS and UNA.AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REN.ASUNA.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.95%

-23.76%

-53.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.24%

-23.76%

-26.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.12%

-23.76%

-28.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.12%

-23.76%

-28.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.71%

-23.76%

-13.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.37%

-6.46%

-24.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.05%

10.34%

+15.71%

Volatility

REN.AS vs. UNA.AS - Volatility Comparison

Relx PLC (REN.AS) has a higher volatility of 11.11% compared to Unilever PLC (UNA.AS) at 4.89%. This indicates that REN.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UNA.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REN.ASUNA.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.11%

4.89%

+6.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.35%

15.48%

+12.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.29%

17.95%

+13.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.98%

17.81%

+4.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.95%

17.81%

+4.14%

Dividends

REN.AS vs. UNA.AS - Dividend Comparison

REN.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, less than UNA.AS's 4.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
REN.AS
Relx PLC
2.61%2.17%1.61%1.78%2.35%1.94%2.58%2.21%2.55%2.28%2.55%1.77%
UNA.AS
Unilever PLC
4.14%3.66%3.50%4.31%4.03%4.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

REN.AS vs. UNA.AS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Relx PLC and Unilever PLC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in EUR except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


REN.AS and UNA.AS have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REN.AS and UNA.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer