PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAX vs. VLUE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BAX vs. VLUE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baxter International Inc. (BAX) and iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAX achieves a 10.21% return, which is significantly lower than VLUE's 44.95% return. Over the past 10 years, BAX has underperformed VLUE with an annualized return of -5.62%, while VLUE has yielded a comparatively higher 15.53% annualized return.


BAX

1D
4.68%
1M
9.75%
YTD
10.21%
6M
10.21%
1Y
-30.63%
3Y*
-20.78%
5Y*
-22.30%
10Y*
-5.62%

VLUE

1D
-0.24%
1M
5.34%
YTD
44.95%
6M
43.41%
1Y
78.89%
3Y*
32.40%
5Y*
16.35%
10Y*
15.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAX vs. VLUE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BAX
Baxter International Inc.
10.21%-33.28%-22.40%-21.91%-39.58%8.48%-2.95%28.40%2.89%47.30%
VLUE
iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF
44.95%32.67%7.25%14.26%-14.17%28.93%-0.23%27.20%-11.13%21.95%

Correlation

The correlation between BAX and VLUE is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2013

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BAX vs. VLUE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAX
BAX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
BAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
BAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

VLUE
VLUE Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
VLUE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VLUE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
VLUE Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
VLUE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
VLUE Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAX vs. VLUE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baxter International Inc. (BAX) and iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BAXVLUEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.71

-0.80

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.63

8.77

-9.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.90

36.50

-37.40

BAX vs. VLUE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAX Sharpe Ratio is -0.65, which is lower than the VLUE Sharpe Ratio of 4.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAX and VLUE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BAX vs. VLUE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAX drawdown since its inception was -81.15%, which is greater than VLUE's maximum drawdown of -39.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAX and VLUE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BAXVLUEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.15%

-39.47%

-41.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.00%

-9.04%

-39.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-65.90%

-17.89%

-48.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-80.61%

-27.12%

-53.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.15%

-39.47%

-41.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-74.89%

-3.69%

-71.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.69%

-6.00%

-15.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

34.17%

2.17%

+32.00%

Volatility

BAX vs. VLUE - Volatility Comparison

Baxter International Inc. (BAX) has a higher volatility of 11.06% compared to iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE) at 9.72%. This indicates that BAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VLUE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BAXVLUEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.06%

9.72%

+1.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.89%

16.12%

+16.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.97%

19.07%

+27.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.97%

18.12%

+15.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.37%

19.94%

+9.43%

Dividends

BAX vs. VLUE - Dividend Comparison

BAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than VLUE's 1.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BAX
Baxter International Inc.
0.95%2.72%3.57%3.00%2.26%1.26%1.19%1.02%1.11%0.94%1.14%87.05%
VLUE
iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF
1.42%2.11%2.73%2.66%3.18%2.22%2.42%2.61%2.70%2.14%2.07%2.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


BAX and VLUE have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BAX has higher volatility (11.06%) compared to VLUE (9.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAX dropped -81.15% vs VLUE's -39.47%.

VLUE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.17 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BAX and VLUE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer