BAUG vs. UGA

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BAUG (Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August) and UGA (United States Gasoline Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - BAUG is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index August, while UGA is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BAUG returned 11.00%/yr vs 22.69%/yr for UGA. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BAUG charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UGA.

Performance

BAUG vs. UGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August (BAUG) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAUG achieves a 6.20% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 64.09% return.

BAUG

• 1D: -0.51%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 6.20%
• 6M: 5.84%
• 1Y: 18.42%
• 3Y*: 17.38%
• 5Y*: 11.00%
• 10Y*: —

UGA

• 1D: -1.12%
• 1M: -12.11%
• YTD: 64.09%
• 6M: 60.42%
• 1Y: 59.74%
• 3Y*: 18.95%
• 5Y*: 22.69%
• 10Y*: 14.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAUG vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BAUG Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August	6.20%	14.81%	21.15%	20.11%	-10.30%	12.06%	12.20%	5.94%
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP	64.09%	-2.00%	3.77%	1.27%	46.34%	68.49%	-24.88%	4.18%

Correlation

The correlation between BAUG and UGA is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.26
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.05
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2019	0.15

The correlation between BAUG and UGA shifts across timeframes, from -0.26 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BAUG vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAUG

BAUG Risk / Return Rank: 81
BAUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
BAUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
BAUG Omega Ratio Rank: 85
BAUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
BAUG Martin Ratio Rank: 85

UGA

UGA Risk / Return Rank: 55
UGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
UGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
UGA Omega Ratio Rank: 49
UGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
UGA Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAUG vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August (BAUG) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BAUG	UGA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.40	1.73	+0.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.47	2.25	+1.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.30	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.27	3.17	+0.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.54	9.39	+7.15

BAUG vs. UGA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAUG Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is higher than the UGA Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAUG and UGA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BAUG vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAUG drawdown since its inception was -24.19%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAUG and UGA.

Drawdown Indicators

	BAUG	UGA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.19%	-86.59%	+62.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.66%	-18.96%	+13.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.78%	-26.68%	+12.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.59%	-38.11%	+22.52%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-75.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.67%	-18.05%	+17.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.83%	-36.69%	+33.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.12%	6.43%	-5.31%

Volatility

BAUG vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August (BAUG) is 1.78%, while United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) has a volatility of 9.24%. This indicates that BAUG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BAUG	UGA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.78%	9.24%	-7.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.97%	30.57%	-24.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.73%	35.22%	-27.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.73%	34.45%	-22.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.91%	37.22%	-23.31%

BAUG vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAUG has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

BAUG vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison

Neither BAUG nor UGA has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BAUG and UGA in my portfolio?

BAUG and UGA have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BAUG or UGA?

UGA has higher volatility (9.24%) compared to BAUG (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAUG dropped -24.19% vs UGA's -86.59%.

Which ETF is better, BAUG or UGA?

On 5-year performance, UGA leads with 22.69% vs 11.00% for BAUG. On fees, UGA is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, BAUG has been the lower-risk option at 1.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BAUG or UGA?

Over the 5-year period, UGA has performed better with a 22.69% return vs 11.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BAUG or UGA?

UGA is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for BAUG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BAUG or UGA?

BAUG and UGA have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between BAUG and UGA?

BAUG is categorized as Defined Outcome, while UGA is Oil & Gas. BAUG tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index August, while UGA tracks Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BAUG and 0.75% for UGA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BAUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.