BAUG vs. QQQ

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

BAUG (Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BAUG is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index August, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BAUG returned 11.37%/yr vs 14.23%/yr for QQQ. Their correlation of 0.88 means they have usually moved in the same direction. BAUG charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.

Performance

BAUG vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August (BAUG) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAUG achieves a 8.35% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 12.26% return.

BAUG

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 1.12%
• 6M: 7.36%
• YTD: 8.35%
• 1Y: 16.10%
• 3Y*: 16.16%
• 5Y*: 11.37%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.65%

QQQ

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: -3.45%
• 6M: 10.89%
• YTD: 12.26%
• 1Y: 24.81%
• 3Y*: 22.29%
• 5Y*: 14.23%
• 10Y*: 20.44%
• ALL TIME*: 10.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BAUG Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August	$705.00K	$399.85K	$286.26K
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF	$30.32B	$28.40B	$31.45B

BAUG vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BAUG Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August	8.35%	14.81%	21.15%	20.11%	-10.30%	12.06%	12.20%	5.94%
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF	12.26%	20.77%	25.58%	54.86%	-32.58%	27.42%	48.62%	11.72%

Correlation

The correlation between BAUG and QQQ is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2019	0.88

The correlation between BAUG and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

BAUG vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BAUG	QQQ
Technology	37.9%	60.9%
Financial Services	11.7%	0.2%
Communication Services	10.0%	13.1%
Consumer Cyclical	9.6%	10.7%
Healthcare	9.1%	3.6%
Industrials	8.4%	2.7%
Consumer Defensive	4.6%	6.3%
Energy	3.0%	0.5%
Utilities	2.3%	1.1%
Real Estate	1.9%	0.1%
Basic Materials	1.7%	1.0%

Return for Risk

BAUG vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BAUG

BAUG Risk / Return Rank: 84
BAUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
BAUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
BAUG Omega Ratio Rank: 87
BAUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
BAUG Martin Ratio Rank: 89

QQQ

QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 49
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 45
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BAUG vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August (BAUG) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BAUG	QQQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.97	1.16	+0.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.86	1.65	+1.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.21	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.66	1.88	+0.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.47	6.00	+7.47

BAUG vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAUG Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is higher than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAUG and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BAUG vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAUG drawdown since its inception was -24.19%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAUG and QQQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	BAUG	QQQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.19%	-82.97%	+58.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.66%	-11.96%	+6.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.78%	-22.77%	+8.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.59%	-35.12%	+19.53%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-7.69%	+7.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.79%	-32.62%	+29.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.12%	3.74%	-2.62%

Volatility

BAUG vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August (BAUG) is 1.30%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 6.87%. This indicates that BAUG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BAUG	QQQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.30%	6.87%	-5.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.92%	16.08%	-10.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.66%	19.38%	-11.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.75%	22.90%	-11.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.82%	22.50%	-8.68%

BAUG vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAUG has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

BAUG vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

BAUG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BAUG Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF	0.44%	0.45%	0.56%	0.62%	0.80%	0.43%	0.55%	0.74%	0.91%	0.84%	1.06%	0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BAUG and QQQ in my portfolio?

BAUG and QQQ have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BAUG or QQQ?

QQQ has higher volatility (6.87%) compared to BAUG (1.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAUG dropped -24.19% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

Which ETF is better, BAUG or QQQ?

On 5-year performance, QQQ leads with 14.23% vs 11.37% for BAUG. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, BAUG has been the lower-risk option at 1.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BAUG or QQQ?

Over the 5-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 14.23% return vs 11.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BAUG or QQQ?

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for BAUG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BAUG or QQQ?

QQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.44%, compared with 0.00% for BAUG.

What is the main difference between BAUG and QQQ?

BAUG is categorized as Defined Outcome, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. BAUG tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index August, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BAUG and 0.18% for QQQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BAUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.