BATT.L vs. AMPS.L
BATT.L (L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF) and AMPS.L (WisdomTree Battery Metals) are both Lithium & Battery Metals funds - BATT.L tracks the Solactive Battery Value-Chain Index while AMPS.L tracks the WisdomTree Battery Metals Commodity. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BATT.L returned 22.31%/yr vs 5.55%/yr for AMPS.L. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BATT.L charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for AMPS.L.
Performance
BATT.L vs. AMPS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BATT.L is traded in USD, while AMPS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the AMPS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BATT.L achieves a 19.47% return, which is significantly higher than AMPS.L's 5.13% return.
BATT.L
- 1D
- -1.82%
- 1M
- -12.18%
- YTD
- 19.47%
- 6M
- 16.49%
- 1Y
- 98.02%
- 3Y*
- 22.31%
- 5Y*
- 13.62%
- 10Y*
- —
AMPS.L
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- -8.36%
- YTD
- 5.13%
- 6M
- 7.05%
- 1Y
- 19.03%
- 3Y*
- 5.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BATT.L vs. AMPS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BATT.L L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF | 19.47% | 71.47% | -1.22% | 8.80% | -6.34% |
AMPS.L WisdomTree Battery Metals | 5.13% | 17.34% | -0.96% | -24.30% | -17.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between BATT.L and AMPS.L is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2022 | 0.39 |
The correlation between BATT.L and AMPS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (all time) to 0.53 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BATT.L vs. AMPS.L — Risk / Return Rank
BATT.L
AMPS.L
BATT.L vs. AMPS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF (BATT.L) and WisdomTree Battery Metals (AMPS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BATT.L | AMPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.21 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.90 | 1.69 | +4.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.06 | 4.89 | +14.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BATT.L vs. AMPS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BATT.L drawdown since its inception was -39.69%, roughly equal to the maximum AMPS.L drawdown of -41.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BATT.L and AMPS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BATT.L | AMPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.69% | -41.31% | +1.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.54% | -11.20% | -5.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.90% | -22.81% | -11.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.44% | -23.25% | +6.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.99% | -30.83% | +18.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.13% | 3.88% | +1.25% |
Volatility
BATT.L vs. AMPS.L - Volatility Comparison
L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF (BATT.L) has a higher volatility of 10.91% compared to WisdomTree Battery Metals (AMPS.L) at 5.92%. This indicates that BATT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMPS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BATT.L | AMPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.91% | 5.92% | +4.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.79% | 13.61% | +12.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.38% | 16.85% | +14.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.92% | 21.09% | +4.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.32% | 21.09% | +4.23% |
BATT.L vs. AMPS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
BATT.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than AMPS.L's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
BATT.L vs. AMPS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither BATT.L nor AMPS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BATT.L and AMPS.L have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMPS.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMPS.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for BATT.L.
BATT.L tracks Solactive Battery Value-Chain Index, while AMPS.L tracks WisdomTree Battery Metals Commodity. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for BATT.L and 0.45% for AMPS.L.
Find the right allocation for BATT.L and AMPS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer