PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BATS.L vs. VAPX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BATS.L vs. VAPX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in British American Tobacco plc (BATS.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VAPX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BATS.L is traded in GBp, while VAPX.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VAPX.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BATS.L achieves a 6.00% return, which is significantly lower than VAPX.L's 40.40% return. Over the past 10 years, BATS.L has underperformed VAPX.L with an annualized return of 7.00%, while VAPX.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.40% annualized return.


BATS.L

1D
1.94%
1M
0.32%
YTD
6.00%
6M
5.80%
1Y
33.89%
3Y*
28.98%
5Y*
18.78%
10Y*
7.00%

VAPX.L

1D
-5.74%
1M
0.98%
YTD
40.40%
6M
44.61%
1Y
72.81%
3Y*
22.38%
5Y*
11.71%
10Y*
12.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BATS.L vs. VAPX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BATS.L
British American Tobacco plc
6.00%56.35%37.24%-23.51%28.17%9.10%-9.61%38.29%-47.15%13.39%
VAPX.L
Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing
40.40%31.34%-3.50%3.89%-1.65%1.83%15.31%12.85%-9.57%20.38%

Correlation

The correlation between BATS.L and VAPX.L is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2013

0.33

Over the past year, the correlation between BATS.L and VAPX.L has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.33, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BATS.L vs. VAPX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BATS.L
BATS.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
BATS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BATS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
BATS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
BATS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
BATS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

VAPX.L
VAPX.L Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
VAPX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VAPX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
VAPX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
VAPX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
VAPX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BATS.L vs. VAPX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for British American Tobacco plc (BATS.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VAPX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BATS.LVAPX.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.63

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

5.40

-2.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.98

20.09

-14.11

BATS.L vs. VAPX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BATS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is lower than the VAPX.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BATS.L and VAPX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BATS.LVAPX.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

3.43

-1.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

0.72

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.71

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.53

-0.12

Drawdowns

BATS.L vs. VAPX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BATS.L drawdown since its inception was -54.44%, which is greater than VAPX.L's maximum drawdown of -30.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BATS.L and VAPX.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BATS.LVAPX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.44%

-30.88%

-23.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.70%

-13.41%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.78%

-16.81%

+2.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.68%

-17.55%

-12.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.44%

-30.88%

-23.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.25%

-9.05%

-2.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.17%

-6.31%

-8.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.65%

3.61%

+2.04%

Volatility

BATS.L vs. VAPX.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for British American Tobacco plc (BATS.L) is 10.27%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VAPX.L) has a volatility of 11.60%. This indicates that BATS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VAPX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BATS.LVAPX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.27%

11.60%

-1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.24%

18.97%

-0.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.87%

21.10%

+1.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.56%

16.21%

+4.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.91%

17.48%

+6.43%

Dividends

BATS.L vs. VAPX.L - Dividend Comparison

BATS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.48%, more than VAPX.L's 1.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BATS.L
British American Tobacco plc
5.48%5.70%8.18%10.06%6.64%7.89%7.77%6.28%7.81%4.35%0.00%0.00%
VAPX.L
Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing
1.91%2.70%3.47%3.53%4.32%3.51%2.08%3.39%3.52%3.10%2.71%3.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


BATS.L and VAPX.L have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BATS.L and VAPX.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer