PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BATG.DE vs. USTY.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BATG.DE vs. USTY.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF (BATG.DE) and SPDR Bloomberg US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USTY.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BATG.DE is traded in EUR, while USTY.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the USTY.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


BATG.DE

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

USTY.L

1D
0.12%
1M
0.95%
YTD
1.56%
6M
1.17%
1Y
3.24%
3Y*
1.06%
5Y*
1.24%
10Y*
1.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BATG.DE vs. USTY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BATG.DE
L&G Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF
0.00%5.88%12.80%12.76%1.17%
USTY.L
SPDR Bloomberg US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF
1.57%-5.12%8.35%0.72%-4.97%

Correlation

The correlation between BATG.DE and USTY.L is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2022

0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BATG.DE vs. USTY.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BATG.DE

USTY.L
USTY.L Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
USTY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USTY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
USTY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
USTY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
USTY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BATG.DE vs. USTY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF (BATG.DE) and SPDR Bloomberg US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USTY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BATG.DE vs. USTY.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BATG.DEUSTY.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

Drawdowns

BATG.DE vs. USTY.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BATG.DEUSTY.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.54%

Volatility

BATG.DE vs. USTY.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BATG.DEUSTY.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.57%

BATG.DE vs. USTY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

BATG.DE has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is higher than USTY.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BATG.DE vs. USTY.L - Dividend Comparison

BATG.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while USTY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.87%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BATG.DE
L&G Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
USTY.L
SPDR Bloomberg US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF
4.87%4.61%3.81%2.81%1.57%1.31%2.49%2.79%2.11%2.11%1.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


BATG.DE and USTY.L have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, USTY.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

USTY.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for BATG.DE.

BATG.DE is categorized as Japan Equities, while USTY.L is Government Bonds. BATG.DE tracks Foxberry Sustainability Consensus Japan, while USTY.L tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: LGIM Managers (Europe) Limited and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for BATG.DE and 0.05% for USTY.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BATG.DE and USTY.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer