BATG.DE vs. SUSW.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BATG.DE (L&G Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF) and SUSW.L (iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - BATG.DE is a Japan Equities fund tracking the Foxberry Sustainability Consensus Japan, while SUSW.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BATG.DE charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SUSW.L.

Performance

BATG.DE vs. SUSW.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF (BATG.DE) and iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SUSW.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BATG.DE

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SUSW.L

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: 3.92%
• YTD: 11.31%
• 6M: 11.35%
• 1Y: 18.73%
• 3Y*: 12.95%
• 5Y*: 10.52%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BATG.DE vs. SUSW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
BATG.DE L&G Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF	0.00%	5.88%	12.80%	12.76%	1.17%
SUSW.L iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)	11.31%	1.89%	18.34%	20.78%	-3.38%

Correlation

The correlation between BATG.DE and SUSW.L is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2022	0.41

Return for Risk

BATG.DE vs. SUSW.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SUSW.L

SUSW.L Risk / Return Rank: 46
SUSW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
SUSW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
SUSW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 44
SUSW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
SUSW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BATG.DE vs. SUSW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF (BATG.DE) and iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SUSW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BATG.DE	SUSW.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.50	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.72	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.76	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	BATG.DE	SUSW.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-32.09%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.80%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-21.13%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.13%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	0.00%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-4.93%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.14%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BATG.DE	SUSW.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.49%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.12%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	12.26%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	14.61%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	16.23%	—

BATG.DE vs. SUSW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

BATG.DE has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than SUSW.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BATG.DE vs. SUSW.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither BATG.DE nor SUSW.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BATG.DE and SUSW.L in my portfolio?

BATG.DE and SUSW.L have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BATG.DE or SUSW.L?

On fees, BATG.DE is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BATG.DE or SUSW.L?

BATG.DE is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SUSW.L.

What is the main difference between BATG.DE and SUSW.L?

BATG.DE is categorized as Japan Equities, while SUSW.L is Global Equities. BATG.DE tracks Foxberry Sustainability Consensus Japan, while SUSW.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: LGIM Managers (Europe) Limited and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for BATG.DE and 0.20% for SUSW.L.