PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BATAX vs. FFANX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BATAX vs. FFANX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series A Portfolio (BATAX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BATAX achieves a 1.87% return, which is significantly lower than FFANX's 7.59% return. Over the past 10 years, BATAX has underperformed FFANX with an annualized return of 3.59%, while FFANX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.90% annualized return.


BATAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.45%
YTD
1.87%
6M
2.32%
1Y
6.13%
3Y*
6.70%
5Y*
3.37%
10Y*
3.59%

FFANX

1D
0.80%
1M
1.62%
YTD
7.59%
6M
8.05%
1Y
17.09%
3Y*
10.99%
5Y*
5.51%
10Y*
6.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BATAX vs. FFANX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BATAX
BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series A Portfolio
1.87%7.37%7.34%6.43%-5.87%1.72%2.75%6.76%2.20%5.21%
FFANX
Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund
7.59%13.16%7.40%11.52%-13.62%8.03%13.10%15.81%-4.06%11.25%

Correlation

The correlation between BATAX and FFANX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.20

The correlation between BATAX and FFANX shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (all time) to 0.34 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BATAX vs. FFANX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BATAX
BATAX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
BATAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BATAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
BATAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
BATAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
BATAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

FFANX
FFANX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FFANX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFANX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFANX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FFANX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFANX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BATAX vs. FFANX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series A Portfolio (BATAX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BATAXFFANXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.12

1.47

+0.65

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.57

3.27

+3.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

27.53

13.93

+13.59

BATAX vs. FFANX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BATAX Sharpe Ratio is 3.00, which is comparable to the FFANX Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BATAX and FFANX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BATAX vs. FFANX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BATAX drawdown since its inception was -17.42%, smaller than the maximum FFANX drawdown of -31.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BATAX and FFANX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BATAXFFANXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.42%

-31.69%

+14.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.94%

-5.20%

+4.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.15%

-7.55%

+6.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.12%

-18.52%

+10.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.42%

-18.52%

+1.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

0.00%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.30%

-3.79%

+2.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.22%

1.22%

-1.00%

Volatility

BATAX vs. FFANX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series A Portfolio (BATAX) is 0.67%, while Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX) has a volatility of 3.02%. This indicates that BATAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFANX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BATAXFFANXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.67%

3.02%

-2.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.45%

6.03%

-4.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05%

7.07%

-5.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.18%

7.94%

-5.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.07%

7.74%

-4.67%

BATAX vs. FFANX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BATAX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FFANX's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

BATAX vs. FFANX - Dividend Comparison

BATAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.74%, more than FFANX's 3.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BATAX
BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series A Portfolio
5.74%5.92%5.45%3.91%3.14%1.82%3.22%4.73%5.36%4.10%0.40%0.00%
FFANX
Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund
3.65%3.97%2.81%2.49%5.75%2.35%2.36%3.67%4.56%2.56%1.43%3.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


BATAX and FFANX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FFANX has higher volatility (3.02%) compared to BATAX (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BATAX dropped -17.42% vs FFANX's -31.69%.

BATAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BATAX and FFANX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer