BASV vs. VCLN

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BASV (Brown Advisory Sustainable Value ETF) and VCLN (Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BASV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Brown Advisory, while VCLN is a Sustainable fund actively managed by Virtus Investment Partners. Over the past year, BASV returned 20.72% vs 72.58% for VCLN. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BASV charges 0.71%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for VCLN.

Performance

BASV vs. VCLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brown Advisory Sustainable Value ETF (BASV) and Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF (VCLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BASV achieves a 9.54% return, which is significantly lower than VCLN's 25.35% return.

BASV

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 4.84%
• YTD: 9.54%
• 6M: 8.35%
• 1Y: 20.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VCLN

• 1D: -3.36%
• 1M: -6.42%
• YTD: 25.35%
• 6M: 23.25%
• 1Y: 72.58%
• 3Y*: 17.94%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BASV vs. VCLN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BASV Brown Advisory Sustainable Value ETF	9.54%	10.32%
VCLN Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF	25.35%	34.25%

Correlation

The correlation between BASV and VCLN is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2025	0.42

Return for Risk

BASV vs. VCLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BASV

BASV Risk / Return Rank: 48
BASV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
BASV Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
BASV Omega Ratio Rank: 46
BASV Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
BASV Martin Ratio Rank: 50

VCLN

VCLN Risk / Return Rank: 81
VCLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
VCLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
VCLN Omega Ratio Rank: 70
VCLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
VCLN Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BASV vs. VCLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Advisory Sustainable Value ETF (BASV) and Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF (VCLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BASV	VCLN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	2.41	-0.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.18	3.11	-0.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.39	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.21	5.05	-2.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.81	18.41	-10.60

BASV vs. VCLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BASV Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is lower than the VCLN Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BASV and VCLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BASV vs. VCLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BASV drawdown since its inception was -9.43%, smaller than the maximum VCLN drawdown of -45.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BASV and VCLN.

Drawdown Indicators

	BASV	VCLN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.43%	-45.66%	+36.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.43%	-14.45%	+5.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-29.25%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.49%	-10.96%	+10.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.66%	-23.91%	+22.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.66%	3.95%	-1.29%

Volatility

BASV vs. VCLN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brown Advisory Sustainable Value ETF (BASV) is 4.35%, while Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF (VCLN) has a volatility of 11.33%. This indicates that BASV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VCLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BASV	VCLN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.35%	11.33%	-6.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.01%	21.41%	-10.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.83%	30.43%	-16.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.75%	27.65%	-13.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.75%	27.65%	-13.90%

BASV vs. VCLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

BASV has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than VCLN's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

BASV vs. VCLN - Dividend Comparison

BASV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than VCLN's 1.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BASV Brown Advisory Sustainable Value ETF	0.38%	0.41%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VCLN Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF	1.67%	2.01%	1.16%	1.14%	0.65%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BASV and VCLN in my portfolio?

BASV and VCLN have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BASV or VCLN?

VCLN has higher volatility (11.33%) compared to BASV (4.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BASV dropped -9.43% vs VCLN's -45.66%.

Which ETF is better, BASV or VCLN?

On 1-year performance, VCLN leads with 72.58% vs 20.72% for BASV. On fees, VCLN is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, BASV has been the lower-risk option at 4.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BASV or VCLN?

Over the 1-year period, VCLN has performed better with a 72.58% return vs 20.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BASV or VCLN?

VCLN is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for BASV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BASV or VCLN?

VCLN has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 0.38% for BASV.

What is the main difference between BASV and VCLN?

BASV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while VCLN is Sustainable. They also come from different issuers: Brown Advisory and Virtus Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.71% for BASV and 0.59% for VCLN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VCLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.