PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BASV vs. PRXV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BASV vs. PRXV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brown Advisory Sustainable Value ETF (BASV) and Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF (PRXV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BASV

1D
-0.57%
1M
4.79%
YTD
7.19%
6M
7.99%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PRXV

1D
-0.03%
1M
4.27%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BASV vs. PRXV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BASV and PRXV is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2026

0.80

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BASV vs. PRXV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Advisory Sustainable Value ETF (BASV) and Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF (PRXV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BASV vs. PRXV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BASVPRXVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.41

4.54

-3.13

Drawdowns

BASV vs. PRXV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BASV drawdown since its inception was -9.43%, which is greater than PRXV's maximum drawdown of -1.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BASV and PRXV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BASVPRXVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.43%

-1.18%

-8.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.57%

-0.03%

-0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.72%

-0.32%

-1.40%

Volatility

BASV vs. PRXV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BASVPRXVDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.59%

9.66%

+3.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.59%

9.66%

+3.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.59%

9.66%

+3.93%

BASV vs. PRXV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BASV has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than PRXV's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

BASV vs. PRXV - Dividend Comparison

BASV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, while PRXV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


BASV and PRXV have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PRXV is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PRXV is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for BASV.

BASV has the higher dividend yield at 0.39%, compared with 0.00% for PRXV.

They also come from different issuers: Brown Advisory and Praxis. Their fees differ too: 0.71% for BASV and 0.36% for PRXV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BASV and PRXV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer