BASV vs. EFFE

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

BASV (Brown Advisory Sustainable Value ETF) and EFFE (Harbor Osmosis Emerging Markets Resource Efficient ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BASV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Brown Advisory, while EFFE is a Sustainable fund actively managed by Harbor. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BASV returned 23.80% vs 21.87% for EFFE. Their 0.51 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BASV charges 0.71%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for EFFE.

Performance

BASV vs. EFFE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brown Advisory Sustainable Value ETF (BASV) and Harbor Osmosis Emerging Markets Resource Efficient ETF (EFFE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BASV having a 14.07% return and EFFE slightly higher at 14.14%.

BASV

• 1D: 1.55%
• 1M: 2.58%
• 6M: 11.42%
• YTD: 14.07%
• 1Y: 23.80%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 22.54%

EFFE

• 1D: 2.26%
• 1M: -2.21%
• 6M: 8.41%
• YTD: 14.14%
• 1Y: 21.87%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 22.29%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BASV Brown Advisory Sustainable Value ETF	$439.72K	$617.98K	$647.17K
EFFE Harbor Osmosis Emerging Markets Resource Efficient ETF	$1.17K	$1.26K	$7.68K

BASV vs. EFFE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BASV Brown Advisory Sustainable Value ETF	14.07%	10.32%
EFFE Harbor Osmosis Emerging Markets Resource Efficient ETF	14.14%	10.47%

Correlation

The correlation between BASV and EFFE is 0.50, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2025	0.51

The correlation between BASV and EFFE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BASV vs. EFFE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BASV

BASV Risk / Return Rank: 66
BASV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
BASV Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
BASV Omega Ratio Rank: 63
BASV Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
BASV Martin Ratio Rank: 67

EFFE

EFFE Risk / Return Rank: 35
EFFE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
EFFE Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
EFFE Omega Ratio Rank: 34
EFFE Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
EFFE Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BASV vs. EFFE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Advisory Sustainable Value ETF (BASV) and Harbor Osmosis Emerging Markets Resource Efficient ETF (EFFE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BASV	EFFE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.70	0.91	+0.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.44	1.34	+1.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.18	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.54	1.35	+1.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.03	4.07	+4.96

BASV vs. EFFE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BASV Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is higher than the EFFE Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BASV and EFFE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BASV vs. EFFE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BASV drawdown since its inception was -9.43%, smaller than the maximum EFFE drawdown of -16.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BASV and EFFE.

Drawdown Indicators

	BASV	EFFE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.43%	-16.31%	+6.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.43%	-16.31%	+6.88%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-11.83%	+11.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.58%	-2.75%	+1.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.64%	5.39%	-2.75%

Volatility

BASV vs. EFFE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brown Advisory Sustainable Value ETF (BASV) is 4.33%, while Harbor Osmosis Emerging Markets Resource Efficient ETF (EFFE) has a volatility of 8.45%. This indicates that BASV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EFFE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BASV	EFFE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.33%	8.45%	-4.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.12%	22.15%	-11.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.06%	24.07%	-10.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.69%	21.83%	-8.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.69%	21.83%	-8.14%

BASV vs. EFFE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BASV has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than EFFE's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

BASV vs. EFFE - Dividend Comparison

BASV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than EFFE's 4.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
BASV Brown Advisory Sustainable Value ETF	0.36%	0.41%
EFFE Harbor Osmosis Emerging Markets Resource Efficient ETF	4.11%	4.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BASV and EFFE in my portfolio?

BASV and EFFE have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BASV or EFFE?

EFFE has higher volatility (8.45%) compared to BASV (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BASV dropped -9.43% vs EFFE's -16.31%.

Which ETF is better, BASV or EFFE?

On 1-year performance, BASV leads with 23.80% vs 21.87% for EFFE. On fees, EFFE is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, BASV has been the lower-risk option at 4.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BASV or EFFE?

Over the 1-year period, BASV has performed better with a 23.80% return vs 21.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BASV or EFFE?

EFFE is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for BASV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BASV or EFFE?

EFFE has the higher dividend yield at 4.11%, compared with 0.36% for BASV.

What is the main difference between BASV and EFFE?

BASV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while EFFE is Sustainable. They also come from different issuers: Brown Advisory and Harbor. Their fees differ too: 0.71% for BASV and 0.69% for EFFE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BASV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.