BAR vs. TSDD
BAR (GraniteShares Gold Trust) and TSDD (GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BAR is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt), while TSDD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. BAR is passively managed, while TSDD is actively managed. Over the past year, BAR returned 32.26% vs -62.89% for TSDD. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. BAR charges 0.17%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for TSDD.
Performance
BAR vs. TSDD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BAR achieves a 2.94% return, which is significantly higher than TSDD's -4.27% return.
BAR
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- 2.94%
- 6M
- 5.50%
- 1Y
- 32.26%
- 3Y*
- 31.38%
- 5Y*
- 18.41%
- 10Y*
- —
TSDD
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -17.41%
- YTD
- -4.27%
- 6M
- -7.92%
- 1Y
- -62.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BAR vs. TSDD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BAR GraniteShares Gold Trust | 2.94% | 64.12% | 26.97% | 8.60% |
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF | -4.27% | -74.84% | -89.21% | -20.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between BAR and TSDD is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2023 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BAR vs. TSDD — Risk / Return Rank
BAR
TSDD
BAR vs. TSDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Gold Trust (BAR) and GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BAR | TSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 0.90 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.69 | -0.83 | +2.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.19 | -1.05 | +5.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BAR | TSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.23 | -0.68 | +1.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | -0.66 | +1.56 |
Drawdowns
BAR vs. TSDD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAR drawdown since its inception was -21.53%, smaller than the maximum TSDD drawdown of -99.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAR and TSDD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BAR | TSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.53% | -99.03% | +77.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.19% | -76.12% | +56.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.19% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.72% | -98.90% | +81.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.45% | -71.21% | +64.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.72% | 59.88% | -52.16% |
Volatility
BAR vs. TSDD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GraniteShares Gold Trust (BAR) is 5.46%, while GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD) has a volatility of 24.19%. This indicates that BAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BAR | TSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.46% | 24.19% | -18.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.03% | 54.90% | -31.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.43% | 92.57% | -66.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.90% | 114.46% | -96.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.38% | 114.46% | -98.08% |
BAR vs. TSDD - Expense Ratio Comparison
BAR has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than TSDD's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
BAR vs. TSDD - Dividend Comparison
BAR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.80%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BAR GraniteShares Gold Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF | 8.80% | 8.42% | 0.00% | 24.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BAR and TSDD have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSDD has higher volatility (24.19%) compared to BAR (5.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAR dropped -21.53% vs TSDD's -99.03%.
On 1-year performance, BAR leads with 32.26% vs -62.89% for TSDD. On fees, BAR is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, BAR has been the lower-risk option at 5.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BAR has performed better with a 32.26% return vs -62.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BAR is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for TSDD.
TSDD has the higher dividend yield at 8.80%, compared with 0.00% for BAR.
BAR is categorized as Gold, while TSDD is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for BAR and 1.50% for TSDD.
BAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BAR and TSDD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer