BAR vs. TSDD
BAR (GraniteShares Gold Trust) and TSDD (GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BAR is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt), while TSDD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. BAR is passively managed, while TSDD is actively managed. Over the past year, BAR returned 20.54% vs -50.55% for TSDD. Their -0.07 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. BAR charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TSDD.
Performance
BAR vs. TSDD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BAR achieves a -6.10% return, which is significantly lower than TSDD's 37.39% return.
BAR
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -1.60%
- 6M
- -12.98%
- YTD
- -6.10%
- 1Y
- 20.54%
- 3Y*
- 27.61%
- 5Y*
- 17.26%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.26%
TSDD
- 1D
- -7.09%
- 1M
- 34.60%
- 6M
- 24.94%
- YTD
- 37.39%
- 1Y
- -50.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -69.67%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $8.15M | $7.49M | $9.63M | |
| $152.97M | $157.39M | $198.36M |
BAR vs. TSDD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BAR GraniteShares Gold Trust | -6.10% | 64.12% | 26.97% | 8.80% |
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF | 37.39% | -74.84% | -89.21% | -20.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between BAR and TSDD is -0.23, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2023 | -0.07 |
The correlation between BAR and TSDD shifts across timeframes, from -0.23 (1 year) to -0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BAR vs. TSDD — Risk / Return Rank
BAR
TSDD
BAR vs. TSDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Gold Trust (BAR) and GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BAR | TSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 0.95 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.78 | -0.74 | +1.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.68 | -0.93 | +2.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BAR vs. TSDD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAR drawdown since its inception was -26.32%, smaller than the maximum TSDD drawdown of -99.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAR and TSDD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BAR | TSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.32% | -99.03% | +72.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.32% | -68.22% | +41.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.32% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.94% | -98.43% | +73.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.76% | -72.64% | +65.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.26% | 56.18% | -43.92% |
Volatility
BAR vs. TSDD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GraniteShares Gold Trust (BAR) is 5.98%, while GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD) has a volatility of 36.11%. This indicates that BAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BAR | TSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.98% | 36.11% | -30.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.76% | 67.54% | -46.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.90% | 92.83% | -64.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.38% | 115.19% | -96.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.61% | 115.19% | -98.58% |
BAR vs. TSDD - Expense Ratio Comparison
BAR has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than TSDD's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
BAR vs. TSDD - Dividend Comparison
BAR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.13%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BAR GraniteShares Gold Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF | 6.13% | 8.42% | 0.00% | 24.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BAR and TSDD have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSDD has higher volatility (36.11%) compared to BAR (5.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAR dropped -26.32% vs TSDD's -99.03%.
On 1-year performance, BAR leads with 20.54% vs -50.55% for TSDD. On fees, BAR is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, BAR has been the lower-risk option at 5.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BAR has performed better with a 20.54% return vs -50.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BAR is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TSDD.
TSDD has the higher dividend yield at 6.13%, compared with 0.00% for BAR.
BAR is categorized as Gold, while TSDD is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for BAR and 0.95% for TSDD.
BAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.74 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BAR and TSDD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer