BAPR vs. PJAN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BAPR (Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April) and PJAN (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - January) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator - BAPR tracks the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index April while PJAN tracks the Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect January Series Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BAPR returned 11.17%/yr vs 8.92%/yr for PJAN. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

BAPR vs. PJAN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - January (PJAN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAPR achieves a 10.81% return, which is significantly higher than PJAN's 5.13% return.

BAPR

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 2.21%
• YTD: 10.81%
• 6M: 11.74%
• 1Y: 20.12%
• 3Y*: 15.31%
• 5Y*: 11.17%
• 10Y*: —

PJAN

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 1.94%
• YTD: 5.13%
• 6M: 5.96%
• 1Y: 14.71%
• 3Y*: 12.96%
• 5Y*: 8.92%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAPR vs. PJAN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April	10.81%	8.28%	15.95%	23.16%	-7.04%	12.58%	6.19%	10.49%
PJAN Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - January	5.13%	11.29%	13.45%	18.18%	-5.29%	8.80%	7.68%	5.26%

Correlation

The correlation between BAPR and PJAN is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2019	0.86

The correlation between BAPR and PJAN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BAPR vs. PJAN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAPR

BAPR Risk / Return Rank: 96
BAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
BAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
BAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 97
BAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
BAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

PJAN

PJAN Risk / Return Rank: 79
PJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
PJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
PJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 87
PJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
PJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAPR vs. PJAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - January (PJAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BAPR	PJAN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.59	2.55	+1.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	6.11	3.75	+2.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.87	1.54	+0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	10.46	3.19	+7.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	57.55	17.03	+40.52
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BAPR vs. PJAN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAPR Sharpe Ratio is 3.59, which is higher than the PJAN Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAPR and PJAN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BAPR	PJAN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.59	2.55	+1.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98	1.00	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.84	0.90	-0.06

Drawdowns

BAPR vs. PJAN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAPR drawdown since its inception was -23.91%, which is greater than PJAN's maximum drawdown of -21.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAPR and PJAN.

Drawdown Indicators

	BAPR	PJAN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.91%	-21.25%	-2.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.93%	-4.63%	+2.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.58%	-10.49%	-5.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.58%	-11.93%	-3.65%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.23%	-0.26%	+0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.59%	-1.73%	-0.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.35%	0.87%	-0.52%

Volatility

BAPR vs. PJAN - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - January (PJAN) have volatilities of 1.06% and 1.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BAPR	PJAN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.06%	1.07%	-0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.53%	4.71%	-0.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.64%	5.81%	-0.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.49%	8.93%	+2.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.12%	10.60%	+2.52%

BAPR vs. PJAN - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BAPR and PJAN have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

BAPR vs. PJAN - Dividend Comparison

Neither BAPR nor PJAN has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BAPR and PJAN in my portfolio?

BAPR and PJAN have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BAPR or PJAN?

PJAN has higher volatility (1.07%) compared to BAPR (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAPR dropped -23.91% vs PJAN's -21.25%.

Which ETF is better, BAPR or PJAN?

On 5-year performance, BAPR leads with 11.17% vs 8.92% for PJAN. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BAPR or PJAN?

Over the 5-year period, BAPR has performed better with a 11.17% return vs 8.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BAPR or PJAN?

BAPR and PJAN have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BAPR or PJAN?

BAPR and PJAN have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between BAPR and PJAN?

BAPR tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index April, while PJAN tracks Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect January Series Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.59 vs 2.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.