PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAPR vs. IBIC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BAPR vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAPR achieves a 10.78% return, which is significantly higher than IBIC's 2.39% return.


BAPR

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.61%
YTD
10.78%
6M
10.81%
1Y
19.95%
3Y*
14.74%
5Y*
11.03%
10Y*

IBIC

1D
0.06%
1M
0.08%
YTD
2.39%
6M
2.49%
1Y
4.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAPR vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BAPR
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April
10.78%8.28%15.95%5.42%
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
2.39%4.96%5.25%2.17%

Correlation

The correlation between BAPR and IBIC is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023

-0.05

The correlation between BAPR and IBIC shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to -0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BAPR vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAPR
BAPR Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
BAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
BAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIC
IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAPR vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BAPRIBICDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.83

2.21

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.37

16.41

-6.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

51.30

58.11

-6.81

BAPR vs. IBIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAPR Sharpe Ratio is 3.49, which is comparable to the IBIC Sharpe Ratio of 4.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAPR and IBIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BAPR vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAPR drawdown since its inception was -23.91%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAPR and IBIC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BAPRIBICDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.91%

-0.90%

-23.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.93%

-0.27%

-1.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

-0.11%

-0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.58%

-0.10%

-2.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.39%

0.08%

+0.31%

Volatility

BAPR vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR) has a higher volatility of 1.93% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.16%. This indicates that BAPR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BAPRIBICDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.93%

0.16%

+1.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.85%

0.67%

+4.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.76%

0.89%

+4.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.51%

1.57%

+9.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.09%

1.57%

+11.52%

BAPR vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAPR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

BAPR vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison

BAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%.


PositionTTM202520242023
BAPR
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
3.59%4.43%4.65%0.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


BAPR and IBIC have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BAPR has higher volatility (1.93%) compared to IBIC (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAPR dropped -23.91% vs IBIC's -0.90%.

On 1-year performance, BAPR leads with 19.95% vs 4.38% for IBIC. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BAPR has performed better with a 19.95% return vs 4.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for BAPR.

IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 0.00% for BAPR.

BAPR is categorized as Defined Outcome, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. BAPR tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index April, while IBIC tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BAPR and 0.10% for IBIC.

IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.94 vs 3.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BAPR and IBIC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer