PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAPR vs. AAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BAPR vs. AAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To April 2026 (AAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAPR achieves a 10.81% return, which is significantly higher than AAPR's 3.82% return.


BAPR

1D
-0.23%
1M
2.21%
YTD
10.81%
6M
11.74%
1Y
20.12%
3Y*
15.31%
5Y*
11.17%
10Y*

AAPR

1D
-0.14%
1M
0.68%
YTD
3.82%
6M
4.48%
1Y
9.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAPR vs. AAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BAPR and AAPR is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024

0.86

The correlation between BAPR and AAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BAPR vs. AAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAPR
BAPR Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
BAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
BAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

AAPR
AAPR Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
AAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAPR vs. AAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To April 2026 (AAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BAPRAAPRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.87

1.99

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.46

12.12

-1.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

57.55

62.99

-5.43

BAPR vs. AAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAPR Sharpe Ratio is 3.59, which is comparable to the AAPR Sharpe Ratio of 4.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAPR and AAPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BAPRAAPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.59

4.18

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

1.73

-0.90

Drawdowns

BAPR vs. AAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAPR drawdown since its inception was -23.91%, which is greater than AAPR's maximum drawdown of -5.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAPR and AAPR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BAPRAAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.91%

-5.99%

-17.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.93%

-0.81%

-1.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

-0.15%

-0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.59%

-0.45%

-2.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.35%

0.16%

+0.19%

Volatility

BAPR vs. AAPR - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR) has a higher volatility of 1.06% compared to Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To April 2026 (AAPR) at 0.68%. This indicates that BAPR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BAPRAAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.06%

0.68%

+0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.53%

1.57%

+2.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.64%

2.36%

+3.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.49%

4.81%

+6.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.12%

4.81%

+8.31%

BAPR vs. AAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BAPR and AAPR have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Dividends

BAPR vs. AAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither BAPR nor AAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BAPR and AAPR have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BAPR has higher volatility (1.06%) compared to AAPR (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAPR dropped -23.91% vs AAPR's -5.99%.

On 1-year performance, BAPR leads with 20.12% vs 9.83% for AAPR. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, AAPR has been the lower-risk option at 0.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BAPR has performed better with a 20.12% return vs 9.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BAPR and AAPR have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

BAPR and AAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

BAPR is categorized as Defined Outcome, while AAPR is Options Trading.

AAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.18 vs 3.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BAPR and AAPR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer