BAMY vs. BAMU

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BAMY (Brookstone Yield ETF) and BAMU (Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BAMY is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Brookstone, while BAMU is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Brookstone. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BAMY returned 10.68% vs 2.93% for BAMU. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BAMY charges 1.48%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for BAMU.

Performance

BAMY vs. BAMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookstone Yield ETF (BAMY) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAMY achieves a 1.16% return, which is significantly higher than BAMU's 1.06% return.

BAMY

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 0.31%
• YTD: 1.16%
• 6M: 1.80%
• 1Y: 10.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BAMU

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.20%
• YTD: 1.06%
• 6M: 1.25%
• 1Y: 2.93%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAMY vs. BAMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BAMY Brookstone Yield ETF	1.16%	12.93%	10.60%	5.20%
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	1.06%	3.21%	4.14%	1.16%

Correlation

The correlation between BAMY and BAMU is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2023	0.02

The correlation between BAMY and BAMU shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BAMY vs. BAMU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BAMY	BAMU
Technology	40.4%	-
Communication Services	13.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	12.6%	-
Healthcare	8.7%	-
Financial Services	6.8%	98.8%
Industrials	6.6%	-
Consumer Defensive	5.3%	-
Utilities	2.5%	-
Basic Materials	1.5%	-
Energy	1.5%	-
Real Estate	1.3%	-

Return for Risk

BAMY vs. BAMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAMY

BAMY Risk / Return Rank: 79
BAMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
BAMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
BAMY Omega Ratio Rank: 81
BAMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
BAMY Martin Ratio Rank: 88

BAMU

BAMU Risk / Return Rank: 98
BAMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
BAMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Omega Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BAMU Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAMY vs. BAMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookstone Yield ETF (BAMY) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BAMY	BAMU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.33	4.98	-2.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.39	8.77	-5.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	2.41	-0.92
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.32	24.89	-20.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.33	97.89	-78.56
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BAMY vs. BAMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAMY Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is lower than the BAMU Sharpe Ratio of 4.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAMY and BAMU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BAMY	BAMU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.33	4.98	-2.65
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.87	4.14	-2.27

Drawdowns

BAMY vs. BAMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAMY drawdown since its inception was -6.03%, which is greater than BAMU's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAMY and BAMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	BAMY	BAMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.03%	-0.36%	-5.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.48%	-0.12%	-2.36%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.24%	0.00%	-0.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.53%	-0.02%	-0.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.55%	0.03%	+0.52%

Volatility

BAMY vs. BAMU - Volatility Comparison

Brookstone Yield ETF (BAMY) has a higher volatility of 1.09% compared to Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU) at 0.07%. This indicates that BAMY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BAMY	BAMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.09%	0.07%	+1.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.80%	0.43%	+2.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.62%	0.59%	+4.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.03%	0.87%	+5.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.03%	0.87%	+5.16%

BAMY vs. BAMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAMY has a 1.48% expense ratio, which is higher than BAMU's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

BAMY vs. BAMU - Dividend Comparison

BAMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.59%, more than BAMU's 3.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	3.06%	3.20%	3.97%	0.84%
BAMY Brookstone Yield ETF	7.59%	7.16%	8.20%	1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BAMY and BAMU in my portfolio?

BAMY and BAMU have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BAMY or BAMU?

BAMY has higher volatility (1.09%) compared to BAMU (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAMY dropped -6.03% vs BAMU's -0.36%.

Which ETF is better, BAMY or BAMU?

On 1-year performance, BAMY leads with 10.68% vs 2.93% for BAMU. On fees, BAMU is cheaper at 1.09% per year. On volatility, BAMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BAMY or BAMU?

Over the 1-year period, BAMY has performed better with a 10.68% return vs 2.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BAMY or BAMU?

BAMU is cheaper with a 1.09% expense ratio, compared with 1.48% for BAMY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BAMY or BAMU?

BAMY has the higher dividend yield at 7.59%, compared with 3.06% for BAMU.

What is the main difference between BAMY and BAMU?

BAMY is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while BAMU is Ultrashort Bond. Their fees differ too: 1.48% for BAMY and 1.09% for BAMU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BAMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.98 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.