BAMV vs. SEIV

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BAMV (Brookstone Value Stock ETF) and SEIV (SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BAMV returned 15.31% vs 39.83% for SEIV. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BAMV charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SEIV.

Performance

BAMV vs. SEIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookstone Value Stock ETF (BAMV) and SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF (SEIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAMV achieves a 10.04% return, which is significantly lower than SEIV's 15.71% return.

BAMV

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 0.99%
• YTD: 10.04%
• 6M: 9.77%
• 1Y: 15.31%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SEIV

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: 2.03%
• YTD: 15.71%
• 6M: 14.71%
• 1Y: 39.83%
• 3Y*: 25.68%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAMV vs. SEIV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BAMV Brookstone Value Stock ETF	10.04%	7.66%	12.03%	13.82%
SEIV SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF	15.71%	27.43%	19.73%	12.95%

Correlation

The correlation between BAMV and SEIV is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2023	0.79

The correlation between BAMV and SEIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

BAMV vs. SEIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BAMV	SEIV
Financial Services	28.3%	14.0%
Technology	26.0%	37.6%
Industrials	10.4%	3.7%
Healthcare	9.8%	9.9%
Communication Services	8.7%	10.5%
Energy	5.9%	2.5%
Basic Materials	4.9%	1.6%
Real Estate	2.8%	0.3%
Consumer Cyclical	2.1%	10.1%
Consumer Defensive	0.8%	3.7%
Utilities	0.3%	6.0%

Return for Risk

BAMV vs. SEIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAMV

BAMV Risk / Return Rank: 43
BAMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
BAMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
BAMV Omega Ratio Rank: 36
BAMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
BAMV Martin Ratio Rank: 48

SEIV

SEIV Risk / Return Rank: 92
SEIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
SEIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
SEIV Omega Ratio Rank: 91
SEIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
SEIV Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAMV vs. SEIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookstone Value Stock ETF (BAMV) and SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF (SEIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BAMV	SEIV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.29	3.14	-1.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.90	4.25	-2.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.56	-0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.47	5.76	-3.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.45	22.20	-14.75

BAMV vs. SEIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAMV Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is lower than the SEIV Sharpe Ratio of 3.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAMV and SEIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BAMV vs. SEIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAMV drawdown since its inception was -14.56%, smaller than the maximum SEIV drawdown of -18.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAMV and SEIV.

Drawdown Indicators

	BAMV	SEIV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.56%	-18.18%	+3.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.23%	-6.95%	+0.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.71%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.17%	-3.00%	+1.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.99%	-3.47%	+1.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.06%	1.80%	+0.26%

Volatility

BAMV vs. SEIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brookstone Value Stock ETF (BAMV) is 3.75%, while SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF (SEIV) has a volatility of 4.84%. This indicates that BAMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BAMV	SEIV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.75%	4.84%	-1.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.62%	9.64%	-1.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.90%	12.77%	-0.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.72%	16.68%	-2.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.72%	16.68%	-2.96%

BAMV vs. SEIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAMV has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SEIV's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

BAMV vs. SEIV - Dividend Comparison

BAMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, less than SEIV's 1.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BAMV Brookstone Value Stock ETF	1.27%	1.32%	3.66%	0.19%	0.00%
SEIV SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF	1.37%	1.51%	1.66%	2.08%	1.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BAMV and SEIV in my portfolio?

BAMV and SEIV have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BAMV or SEIV?

SEIV has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to BAMV (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAMV dropped -14.56% vs SEIV's -18.18%.

Which ETF is better, BAMV or SEIV?

On 1-year performance, SEIV leads with 39.83% vs 15.31% for BAMV. On fees, SEIV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, BAMV has been the lower-risk option at 3.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BAMV or SEIV?

Over the 1-year period, SEIV has performed better with a 39.83% return vs 15.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BAMV or SEIV?

SEIV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BAMV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BAMV or SEIV?

SEIV has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 1.27% for BAMV.

What is the main difference between BAMV and SEIV?

They also come from different issuers: Brookstone and SEI. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BAMV and 0.15% for SEIV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SEIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.