PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAMU vs. VGUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BAMU vs. VGUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU) and Vanguard Ultra-Short Treasury ETF (VGUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BAMU vs. VGUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAMU achieves a 0.60% return, which is significantly lower than VGUS's 0.81% return.


BAMU

1D
-0.00%
1M
0.18%
YTD
0.60%
6M
1.39%
1Y
2.95%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VGUS

1D
0.01%
1M
0.25%
YTD
0.81%
6M
1.82%
1Y
4.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BAMU vs. VGUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAMU has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VGUS's 0.07% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BAMU vs. VGUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAMU
BAMU Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
BAMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAMU Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
BAMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAMU Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

VGUS
VGUS Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
VGUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGUS Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
VGUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGUS Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAMU vs. VGUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU) and Vanguard Ultra-Short Treasury ETF (VGUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BAMUVGUSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.42

11.39

-6.97

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

7.57

31.34

-23.77

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

2.12

8.64

-6.52

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

25.11

55.20

-30.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

89.35

367.74

-278.39

BAMU vs. VGUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAMU Sharpe Ratio is 4.42, which is lower than the VGUS Sharpe Ratio of 11.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAMU and VGUS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BAMUVGUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.42

11.39

-6.97

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

4.11

11.78

-7.67

Correlation

The correlation between BAMU and VGUS is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

BAMU vs. VGUS - Dividend Comparison

BAMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, less than VGUS's 3.66% yield.


TTM202520242023
BAMU
Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF
3.13%3.20%3.97%0.84%
VGUS
Vanguard Ultra-Short Treasury ETF
3.66%3.12%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BAMU vs. VGUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAMU drawdown since its inception was -0.36%, which is greater than VGUS's maximum drawdown of -0.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAMU and VGUS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BAMUVGUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.36%

-0.07%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.12%

-0.07%

-0.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.02%

0.00%

-0.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.03%

0.01%

+0.02%

Volatility

BAMU vs. VGUS - Volatility Comparison

Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU) has a higher volatility of 0.20% compared to Vanguard Ultra-Short Treasury ETF (VGUS) at 0.07%. This indicates that BAMU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BAMUVGUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.20%

0.07%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.47%

0.16%

+0.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67%

0.35%

+0.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.90%

0.35%

+0.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.90%

0.35%

+0.55%