BAMU vs. CUSD

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU) and CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF (CUSD).

BAMU and CUSD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BAMU is an actively managed fund by Brookstone. It was launched on Sep 26, 2023. CUSD is an actively managed fund by CrossingBridge. It was launched on Sep 20, 2021.

Performance

BAMU vs. CUSD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU) and CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF (CUSD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BAMU vs. CUSD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	0.66%	3.21%	4.14%	1.20%
CUSD CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF	1.37%	5.02%	4.57%	1.18%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAMU achieves a 0.66% return, which is significantly lower than CUSD's 1.37% return.

BAMU

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 0.66%
• 6M: 1.40%
• 1Y: 2.97%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CUSD

• 1D: -1.51%
• 1M: -0.08%
• YTD: 1.37%
• 6M: 1.50%
• 1Y: 4.89%
• 3Y*: 5.09%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAMU vs. CUSD - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAMU has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than CUSD's 0.81% expense ratio.

BAMU

Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF

CUSD

CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF

Return for Risk

BAMU vs. CUSD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAMU

BAMU Risk / Return Rank: 99
BAMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
BAMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
BAMU Omega Ratio Rank: 99
BAMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BAMU Martin Ratio Rank: 99

CUSD

CUSD Risk / Return Rank: 25
CUSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
CUSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
CUSD Omega Ratio Rank: 26
CUSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
CUSD Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAMU vs. CUSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU) and CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF (CUSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BAMU	CUSD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	4.44	0.38	+4.06
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	7.62	0.66	+6.96
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.12	1.11	+1.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	25.45	0.91	+24.54
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	90.59	2.63	+87.96
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BAMU vs. CUSD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAMU Sharpe Ratio is 4.44, which is higher than the CUSD Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAMU and CUSD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BAMU	CUSD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.44	0.38	+4.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	4.13	0.73	+3.40

Correlation

The correlation between BAMU and CUSD is -0.00. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

BAMU vs. CUSD - Dividend Comparison

BAMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, less than CUSD's 13.86% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	3.13%	3.20%	3.97%	0.84%	0.00%
CUSD CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF	13.86%	14.05%	7.10%	3.62%	1.14%

Drawdowns

BAMU vs. CUSD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAMU drawdown since its inception was -0.36%, smaller than the maximum CUSD drawdown of -5.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAMU and CUSD.

Drawdown Indicators

	BAMU	CUSD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.36%	-5.42%	+5.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.12%	-5.42%	+5.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.80%	+2.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.02%	-0.40%	+0.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.03%	1.88%	-1.85%

Volatility

BAMU vs. CUSD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU) is 0.20%, while CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF (CUSD) has a volatility of 4.22%. This indicates that BAMU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CUSD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BAMU	CUSD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.20%	4.22%	-4.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.47%	9.47%	-9.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67%	12.90%	-12.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.90%	6.54%	-5.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.90%	6.54%	-5.64%