BAMPX vs. PRPFX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BAMPX (BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Inv A) and PRPFX (Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, BAMPX returned 6.87%/yr vs 11.12%/yr for PRPFX. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BAMPX charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.81%/yr for PRPFX.

Performance

BAMPX vs. PRPFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Inv A (BAMPX) and Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio (PRPFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BAMPX having a 7.02% return and PRPFX slightly higher at 7.27%. Over the past 10 years, BAMPX has underperformed PRPFX with an annualized return of 6.87%, while PRPFX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.12% annualized return.

BAMPX

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: 3.72%
• YTD: 7.02%
• 6M: 7.22%
• 1Y: 16.90%
• 3Y*: 11.50%
• 5Y*: 5.17%
• 10Y*: 6.87%

PRPFX

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: 1.48%
• YTD: 7.27%
• 6M: 9.63%
• 1Y: 24.05%
• 3Y*: 21.67%
• 5Y*: 11.79%
• 10Y*: 11.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAMPX vs. PRPFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BAMPX BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Inv A	7.02%	13.05%	8.15%	11.99%	-15.08%	3.39%	19.09%	16.23%	-4.07%	11.28%
PRPFX Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio	7.27%	28.78%	19.36%	11.96%	-5.48%	10.87%	18.80%	19.20%	-7.02%	11.42%

Correlation

The correlation between BAMPX and PRPFX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.61
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2006	0.71

The correlation between BAMPX and PRPFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BAMPX vs. PRPFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAMPX

BAMPX Risk / Return Rank: 69
BAMPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
BAMPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
BAMPX Omega Ratio Rank: 74
BAMPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
BAMPX Martin Ratio Rank: 67

PRPFX

PRPFX Risk / Return Rank: 46
PRPFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
PRPFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
PRPFX Omega Ratio Rank: 53
PRPFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
PRPFX Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAMPX vs. PRPFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Inv A (BAMPX) and Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio (PRPFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BAMPX	PRPFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.47	1.95	+0.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.59	2.39	+1.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.40	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.97	3.00	-0.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.07	8.36	+4.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BAMPX vs. PRPFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAMPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the PRPFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAMPX and PRPFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BAMPX	PRPFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.47	1.95	+0.51
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57	1.07	-0.50
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81	1.05	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	0.81	-0.23

Drawdowns

BAMPX vs. PRPFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAMPX drawdown since its inception was -39.58%, which is greater than PRPFX's maximum drawdown of -27.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAMPX and PRPFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BAMPX	PRPFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.58%	-27.16%	-12.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.81%	-8.10%	+2.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.29%	-8.19%	-0.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.13%	-15.49%	-4.64%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-20.13%	-20.84%	+0.71%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-4.04%	+4.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.87%	-3.52%	-1.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.31%	2.90%	-1.59%

Volatility

BAMPX vs. PRPFX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Inv A (BAMPX) and Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio (PRPFX) have volatilities of 2.62% and 2.71%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BAMPX	PRPFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.62%	2.71%	-0.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.95%	11.20%	-5.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.98%	12.48%	-5.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.08%	11.06%	-1.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.47%	10.61%	-2.14%

BAMPX vs. PRPFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAMPX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than PRPFX's 0.81% expense ratio.

Dividends

BAMPX vs. PRPFX - Dividend Comparison

BAMPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.05%, more than PRPFX's 3.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BAMPX BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Inv A	5.05%	5.40%	3.11%	2.67%	2.72%	6.11%	4.12%	2.36%	7.62%	2.17%	1.57%	9.54%
PRPFX Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio	3.05%	3.27%	1.86%	1.39%	1.58%	2.05%	5.38%	4.69%	6.90%	2.14%	0.95%	7.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BAMPX and PRPFX in my portfolio?

BAMPX and PRPFX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BAMPX or PRPFX?

PRPFX has higher volatility (2.71%) compared to BAMPX (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAMPX dropped -39.58% vs PRPFX's -27.16%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BAMPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.