PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAMPX vs. BIMPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BAMPX vs. BIMPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Inv A (BAMPX) and BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Fund (BIMPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BAMPX having a 6.57% return and BIMPX slightly higher at 6.64%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BAMPX having a 6.82% annualized return and BIMPX not far behind at 6.81%.


BAMPX

1D
-0.41%
1M
2.70%
YTD
6.57%
6M
6.77%
1Y
15.89%
3Y*
11.34%
5Y*
4.96%
10Y*
6.82%

BIMPX

1D
-0.48%
1M
2.67%
YTD
6.64%
6M
6.89%
1Y
16.23%
3Y*
10.47%
5Y*
4.60%
10Y*
6.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAMPX vs. BIMPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BAMPX
BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Inv A
6.57%13.05%8.15%11.99%-15.08%3.39%19.09%16.23%-4.07%11.28%
BIMPX
BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Fund
6.64%13.43%4.93%12.41%-14.84%3.51%19.76%16.65%-3.77%11.77%

Correlation

The correlation between BAMPX and BIMPX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2006

0.99

The correlation between BAMPX and BIMPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BAMPX vs. BIMPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAMPX
BAMPX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BAMPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAMPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAMPX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
BAMPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAMPX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

BIMPX
BIMPX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
BIMPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIMPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIMPX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
BIMPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIMPX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAMPX vs. BIMPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Inv A (BAMPX) and BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Fund (BIMPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BAMPXBIMPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.47

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

2.95

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.56

12.90

-0.34

BAMPX vs. BIMPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAMPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the BIMPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAMPX and BIMPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BAMPXBIMPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37

2.41

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.50

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.80

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.59

-0.01

Drawdowns

BAMPX vs. BIMPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAMPX drawdown since its inception was -39.58%, roughly equal to the maximum BIMPX drawdown of -39.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAMPX and BIMPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BAMPXBIMPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.58%

-39.37%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.81%

-5.74%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.29%

-11.11%

+2.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.13%

-19.85%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.13%

-19.85%

-0.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.41%

-0.48%

+0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.87%

-4.78%

-0.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.31%

1.31%

0.00%

Volatility

BAMPX vs. BIMPX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Inv A (BAMPX) and BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Fund (BIMPX) have volatilities of 2.65% and 2.73%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BAMPXBIMPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.65%

2.73%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.95%

5.94%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.99%

7.01%

-0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.08%

9.19%

-0.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.47%

8.57%

-0.10%

BAMPX vs. BIMPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAMPX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than BIMPX's 0.11% expense ratio.


Dividends

BAMPX vs. BIMPX - Dividend Comparison

BAMPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.07%, less than BIMPX's 5.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BAMPX
BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Inv A
5.07%5.40%3.11%2.67%2.72%6.11%4.12%2.36%7.62%2.17%1.57%9.54%
BIMPX
BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Fund
5.33%5.68%0.00%2.96%3.06%6.35%4.34%2.66%7.95%2.50%1.83%9.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, BAMPX and BIMPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BIMPX has higher volatility (2.73%) compared to BAMPX (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAMPX dropped -39.58% vs BIMPX's -39.37%.

BIMPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BAMPX and BIMPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer