PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAMO vs. DWAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BAMO vs. DWAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookstone Opportunities ETF (BAMO) and Arrow DWA Tactical ETF (DWAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BAMO vs. DWAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period


BAMO

1D
1.57%
1M
-3.06%
YTD
-2.42%
6M
-0.07%
1Y
9.70%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DWAT

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BAMO vs. DWAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAMO has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than DWAT's 1.66% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BAMO vs. DWAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAMO
BAMO Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
BAMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
BAMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAMO Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

DWAT
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAMO vs. DWAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookstone Opportunities ETF (BAMO) and Arrow DWA Tactical ETF (DWAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BAMODWATDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.90

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.32

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.44

BAMO vs. DWAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BAMODWATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.19

Dividends

BAMO vs. DWAT - Dividend Comparison

BAMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, while DWAT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023
BAMO
Brookstone Opportunities ETF
1.58%1.54%1.58%0.48%
DWAT
Arrow DWA Tactical ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BAMO vs. DWAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAMO drawdown since its inception was -12.72%, which is greater than DWAT's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAMO and DWAT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BAMODWATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.72%

0.00%

-12.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.97%

0.00%

-3.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.31%

0.00%

-1.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.55%

Volatility

BAMO vs. DWAT - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BAMODWATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.80%

0.00%

+10.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.72%

0.00%

+9.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.72%

0.00%

+9.72%