BAMG vs. VEGN
BAMG (Brookstone Growth Stock ETF) and VEGN (US Vegan Climate ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. BAMG is actively managed, while VEGN is passively managed. Over the past year, BAMG returned 27.89% vs 50.54% for VEGN. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BAMG charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for VEGN.
Performance
BAMG vs. VEGN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BAMG achieves a 10.74% return, which is significantly lower than VEGN's 32.05% return.
BAMG
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 8.86%
- YTD
- 10.74%
- 6M
- 10.41%
- 1Y
- 27.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VEGN
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- 18.62%
- YTD
- 32.05%
- 6M
- 32.41%
- 1Y
- 50.54%
- 3Y*
- 30.01%
- 5Y*
- 16.69%
- 10Y*
- —
BAMG vs. VEGN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BAMG Brookstone Growth Stock ETF | 10.74% | 17.03% | 24.01% | 11.91% |
VEGN US Vegan Climate ETF | 32.05% | 13.71% | 25.42% | 14.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between BAMG and VEGN is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2023 | 0.91 |
The correlation between BAMG and VEGN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
BAMG vs. VEGN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BAMG
VEGN
Technology
Healthcare
Communication Services
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
BAMG
VEGN
Healthcare
BAMG
VEGN
Communication Services
BAMG
VEGN
Financial Services
BAMG
VEGN
Industrials
BAMG
VEGN
Consumer Defensive
BAMG
VEGN
Consumer Cyclical
BAMG
VEGN
Utilities
BAMG
VEGN
Basic Materials
BAMG
VEGN
Energy
BAMG
VEGN
-
Real Estate
BAMG
-
VEGN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BAMG vs. VEGN — Risk / Return Rank
BAMG
VEGN
BAMG vs. VEGN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookstone Growth Stock ETF (BAMG) and US Vegan Climate ETF (VEGN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BAMG | VEGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.53 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.14 | 4.29 | -2.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.37 | 17.47 | -9.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BAMG | VEGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.96 | 3.13 | -1.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.45 | 0.86 | +0.59 |
Drawdowns
BAMG vs. VEGN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAMG drawdown since its inception was -21.00%, smaller than the maximum VEGN drawdown of -34.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAMG and VEGN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BAMG | VEGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.00% | -34.14% | +13.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.08% | -11.85% | -1.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.29% | -0.64% | +0.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.51% | -7.59% | +5.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.34% | 2.90% | +0.44% |
Volatility
BAMG vs. VEGN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Brookstone Growth Stock ETF (BAMG) is 3.68%, while US Vegan Climate ETF (VEGN) has a volatility of 6.10%. This indicates that BAMG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEGN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BAMG | VEGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.68% | 6.10% | -2.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.86% | 13.39% | -2.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.33% | 16.26% | -1.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.97% | 20.27% | -3.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.97% | 22.77% | -5.80% |
BAMG vs. VEGN - Expense Ratio Comparison
BAMG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than VEGN's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
BAMG vs. VEGN - Dividend Comparison
BAMG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VEGN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAMG Brookstone Growth Stock ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.24% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VEGN US Vegan Climate ETF | 0.44% | 0.51% | 0.51% | 0.67% | 0.81% | 0.41% | 0.71% | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BAMG and VEGN have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VEGN has higher volatility (6.10%) compared to BAMG (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAMG dropped -21.00% vs VEGN's -34.14%.
On 1-year performance, VEGN leads with 50.54% vs 27.89% for BAMG. On fees, VEGN is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, BAMG has been the lower-risk option at 3.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VEGN has performed better with a 50.54% return vs 27.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VEGN is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BAMG.
VEGN has the higher dividend yield at 0.44%, compared with 0.00% for BAMG.
They also come from different issuers: Brookstone and Beyond Investing. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BAMG and 0.60% for VEGN.
VEGN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.13 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BAMG and VEGN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer