BAMG vs. USO
BAMG (Brookstone Growth Stock ETF) and USO (United States Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - BAMG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Brookstone, while USO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. BAMG is actively managed, while USO is passively managed. Over the past year, BAMG returned 27.89% vs 101.55% for USO. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. BAMG charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for USO.
Performance
BAMG vs. USO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BAMG achieves a 10.74% return, which is significantly lower than USO's 103.67% return.
BAMG
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 8.86%
- YTD
- 10.74%
- 6M
- 10.41%
- 1Y
- 27.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USO
- 1D
- 2.62%
- 1M
- -4.57%
- YTD
- 103.67%
- 6M
- 99.35%
- 1Y
- 101.55%
- 3Y*
- 29.98%
- 5Y*
- 24.41%
- 10Y*
- 4.07%
BAMG vs. USO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BAMG Brookstone Growth Stock ETF | 10.74% | 17.03% | 24.01% | 11.91% |
USO United States Oil Fund LP | 103.67% | -8.46% | 13.35% | -19.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between BAMG and USO is -0.32, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2023 | -0.10 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between BAMG and USO has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.10 to -0.32, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BAMG vs. USO — Risk / Return Rank
BAMG
USO
BAMG vs. USO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookstone Growth Stock ETF (BAMG) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BAMG | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.38 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.14 | 5.01 | -2.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.37 | 9.42 | -1.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BAMG | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.96 | 2.31 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.10 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.45 | -0.18 | +1.63 |
Drawdowns
BAMG vs. USO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAMG drawdown since its inception was -21.00%, smaller than the maximum USO drawdown of -98.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAMG and USO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BAMG | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.00% | -98.19% | +77.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.08% | -20.39% | +7.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -36.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -86.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.29% | -85.01% | +84.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.51% | -75.30% | +72.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.34% | 10.82% | -7.48% |
Volatility
BAMG vs. USO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Brookstone Growth Stock ETF (BAMG) is 3.68%, while United States Oil Fund LP (USO) has a volatility of 14.87%. This indicates that BAMG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BAMG | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.68% | 14.87% | -11.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.86% | 38.23% | -27.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.33% | 44.20% | -29.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.97% | 36.06% | -19.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.97% | 39.00% | -22.03% |
BAMG vs. USO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BAMG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than USO's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
BAMG vs. USO - Dividend Comparison
Neither BAMG nor USO has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BAMG Brookstone Growth Stock ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.24% | 0.12% |
USO United States Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BAMG and USO have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USO has higher volatility (14.87%) compared to BAMG (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAMG dropped -21.00% vs USO's -98.19%.
On 1-year performance, USO leads with 101.55% vs 27.89% for BAMG. On fees, USO is cheaper at 0.86% per year. On volatility, BAMG has been the lower-risk option at 3.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, USO has performed better with a 101.55% return vs 27.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USO is cheaper with a 0.86% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BAMG.
BAMG and USO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
BAMG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while USO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Brookstone and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BAMG and 0.86% for USO.
USO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BAMG and USO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer