BAMG vs. SPIT

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

BAMG (Brookstone Growth Stock ETF) and SPIT (F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BAMG charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for SPIT.

Performance

BAMG vs. SPIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookstone Growth Stock ETF (BAMG) and F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF (SPIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAMG achieves a 10.77% return, which is significantly lower than SPIT's 27.82% return.

BAMG

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: 1.90%
• 6M: 9.83%
• YTD: 10.77%
• 1Y: 21.17%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SPIT

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: 0.75%
• 6M: 18.85%
• YTD: 27.82%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAMG vs. SPIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BAMG Brookstone Growth Stock ETF	10.77%	4.86%
SPIT F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF	27.82%	5.31%

Correlation

The correlation between BAMG and SPIT is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2025	0.72

Return for Risk

BAMG vs. SPIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAMG

BAMG Risk / Return Rank: 46
BAMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
BAMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
BAMG Omega Ratio Rank: 46
BAMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
BAMG Martin Ratio Rank: 47

SPIT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAMG vs. SPIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookstone Growth Stock ETF (BAMG) and F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF (SPIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BAMG	SPIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.37	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.93	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.63	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.24	—	—

Drawdowns

BAMG vs. SPIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAMG drawdown since its inception was -21.00%, which is greater than SPIT's maximum drawdown of -12.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAMG and SPIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	BAMG	SPIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.00%	-12.49%	-8.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.08%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.83%	-5.04%	+3.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.48%	-2.52%	+0.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.40%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BAMG	SPIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.57%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.57%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.58%	26.32%	-10.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.16%	26.32%	-9.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.16%	26.32%	-9.16%

BAMG vs. SPIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAMG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SPIT's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

BAMG vs. SPIT - Dividend Comparison

BAMG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.62%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BAMG Brookstone Growth Stock ETF	0.00%	0.00%	1.24%	0.12%
SPIT F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF	5.62%	7.18%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BAMG and SPIT in my portfolio?

BAMG and SPIT have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BAMG or SPIT?

On fees, SPIT is cheaper at 0.89% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BAMG or SPIT?

SPIT is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BAMG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BAMG or SPIT?

SPIT has the higher dividend yield at 5.62%, compared with 0.00% for BAMG.

What is the main difference between BAMG and SPIT?

They also come from different issuers: Brookstone and F/m Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BAMG and 0.89% for SPIT.