BAMG vs. SGRT

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

BAMG (Brookstone Growth Stock ETF) and SGRT (SMART Earnings Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.71 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BAMG charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for SGRT.

Performance

BAMG vs. SGRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookstone Growth Stock ETF (BAMG) and SMART Earnings Growth ETF (SGRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAMG achieves a 11.75% return, which is significantly lower than SGRT's 32.95% return.

BAMG

• 1D: 2.57%
• 1M: 0.93%
• 6M: 15.41%
• YTD: 11.75%
• 1Y: 21.38%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 23.24%

SGRT

• 1D: 4.23%
• 1M: -1.19%
• 6M: 24.90%
• YTD: 32.95%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BAMG Brookstone Growth Stock ETF	$376.83K	$787.86K	$620.03K
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth ETF	$1.13M	$1.28M	$2.17M

BAMG vs. SGRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BAMG Brookstone Growth Stock ETF	11.75%	10.83%
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth ETF	32.95%	26.83%

Correlation

The correlation between BAMG and SGRT is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025	0.71

Return for Risk

BAMG vs. SGRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BAMG

BAMG Risk / Return Rank: 45
BAMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
BAMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
BAMG Omega Ratio Rank: 44
BAMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
BAMG Martin Ratio Rank: 49

SGRT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BAMG vs. SGRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookstone Growth Stock ETF (BAMG) and SMART Earnings Growth ETF (SGRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BAMG	SGRT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.34	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.91	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.64	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.27	—	—

Drawdowns

BAMG vs. SGRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAMG drawdown since its inception was -21.00%, smaller than the maximum SGRT drawdown of -24.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAMG and SGRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	BAMG	SGRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.00%	-24.98%	+3.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.08%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.96%	-13.48%	+12.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.51%	-4.34%	+1.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.42%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BAMG	SGRT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.16%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.88%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.09%	39.02%	-22.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.20%	39.02%	-21.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.20%	39.02%	-21.82%

BAMG vs. SGRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAMG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SGRT's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

BAMG vs. SGRT - Dividend Comparison

BAMG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SGRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BAMG Brookstone Growth Stock ETF	0.00%	0.00%	1.24%	0.12%
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth ETF	0.12%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BAMG and SGRT in my portfolio?

BAMG and SGRT have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BAMG or SGRT?

On fees, SGRT is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BAMG or SGRT?

SGRT is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BAMG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BAMG or SGRT?

SGRT has the higher dividend yield at 0.12%, compared with 0.00% for BAMG.

What is the main difference between BAMG and SGRT?

Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BAMG and 0.59% for SGRT.