BAMG vs. SCHB
BAMG (Brookstone Growth Stock ETF) and SCHB (Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BAMG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Brookstone, while SCHB is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index. BAMG is actively managed, while SCHB is passively managed. Over the past year, BAMG returned 27.89% vs 28.12% for SCHB. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BAMG charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHB.
Performance
BAMG vs. SCHB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BAMG achieves a 10.74% return, which is significantly lower than SCHB's 11.28% return.
BAMG
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 8.86%
- YTD
- 10.74%
- 6M
- 10.41%
- 1Y
- 27.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHB
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 5.01%
- YTD
- 11.28%
- 6M
- 11.12%
- 1Y
- 28.12%
- 3Y*
- 22.11%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- 15.04%
BAMG vs. SCHB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BAMG Brookstone Growth Stock ETF | 10.74% | 17.03% | 24.01% | 11.91% |
SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | 11.28% | 16.94% | 23.93% | 12.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between BAMG and SCHB is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2023 | 0.92 |
The correlation between BAMG and SCHB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
BAMG vs. SCHB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BAMG
SCHB
Technology
Healthcare
Communication Services
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Real Estate
-
Technology
BAMG
SCHB
Healthcare
BAMG
SCHB
Communication Services
BAMG
SCHB
Financial Services
BAMG
SCHB
Industrials
BAMG
SCHB
Consumer Defensive
BAMG
SCHB
Consumer Cyclical
BAMG
SCHB
Utilities
BAMG
SCHB
Basic Materials
BAMG
SCHB
Energy
BAMG
SCHB
Real Estate
BAMG
-
SCHB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BAMG vs. SCHB — Risk / Return Rank
BAMG
SCHB
BAMG vs. SCHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookstone Growth Stock ETF (BAMG) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BAMG | SCHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.42 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.14 | 3.17 | -1.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.37 | 14.55 | -6.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BAMG | SCHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.96 | 2.33 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.45 | 0.83 | +0.62 |
Drawdowns
BAMG vs. SCHB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAMG drawdown since its inception was -21.00%, smaller than the maximum SCHB drawdown of -35.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAMG and SCHB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BAMG | SCHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.00% | -35.27% | +14.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.08% | -8.91% | -4.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.29% | -0.72% | +0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.51% | -4.12% | +1.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.34% | 1.94% | +1.40% |
Volatility
BAMG vs. SCHB - Volatility Comparison
Brookstone Growth Stock ETF (BAMG) has a higher volatility of 3.68% compared to Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) at 3.01%. This indicates that BAMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BAMG | SCHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.68% | 3.01% | +0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.86% | 9.14% | +1.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.33% | 12.12% | +2.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.97% | 17.24% | -0.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.97% | 18.32% | -1.35% |
BAMG vs. SCHB - Expense Ratio Comparison
BAMG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHB's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
BAMG vs. SCHB - Dividend Comparison
BAMG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAMG Brookstone Growth Stock ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.24% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | 1.02% | 1.11% | 1.24% | 1.40% | 1.61% | 1.21% | 1.63% | 1.80% | 2.00% | 1.65% | 1.86% | 2.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BAMG and SCHB have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BAMG has higher volatility (3.68%) compared to SCHB (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAMG dropped -21.00% vs SCHB's -35.27%.
On 1-year performance, SCHB leads with 28.12% vs 27.89% for BAMG. On fees, SCHB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHB has been the lower-risk option at 3.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SCHB has performed better with a 28.12% return vs 27.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BAMG.
SCHB has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.00% for BAMG.
BAMG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SCHB is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Brookstone and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BAMG and 0.03% for SCHB.
SCHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BAMG and SCHB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer