BAMG vs. ITOT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BAMG (Brookstone Growth Stock ETF) and ITOT (iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BAMG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Brookstone, while ITOT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P Total Market Index. BAMG is actively managed, while ITOT is passively managed. Over the past year, BAMG returned 27.89% vs 28.12% for ITOT. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BAMG charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for ITOT.

Performance

BAMG vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookstone Growth Stock ETF (BAMG) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BAMG having a 10.74% return and ITOT slightly higher at 11.25%.

BAMG

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 8.86%
• YTD: 10.74%
• 6M: 10.41%
• 1Y: 27.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ITOT

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: 5.01%
• YTD: 11.25%
• 6M: 11.12%
• 1Y: 28.12%
• 3Y*: 22.09%
• 5Y*: 12.69%
• 10Y*: 15.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAMG vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BAMG Brookstone Growth Stock ETF	10.74%	17.03%	24.01%	11.91%
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF	11.25%	17.00%	23.80%	12.67%

Correlation

The correlation between BAMG and ITOT is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2023	0.92

The correlation between BAMG and ITOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

BAMG vs. ITOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BAMG	ITOT
Technology	37.1%	33.8%
Healthcare	12.3%	9.0%
Communication Services	11.7%	10.3%
Financial Services	10.4%	12.1%
Industrials	9.8%	9.5%
Consumer Defensive	8.3%	4.7%
Consumer Cyclical	7.1%	10.1%
Utilities	2.0%	2.3%
Basic Materials	0.8%	2.1%
Energy	0.6%	3.7%
Real Estate	-	2.4%

Return for Risk

BAMG vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAMG

BAMG Risk / Return Rank: 53
BAMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
BAMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
BAMG Omega Ratio Rank: 54
BAMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
BAMG Martin Ratio Rank: 50

ITOT

ITOT Risk / Return Rank: 68
ITOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
ITOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
ITOT Omega Ratio Rank: 67
ITOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
ITOT Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAMG vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookstone Growth Stock ETF (BAMG) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BAMG	ITOT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.96	2.32	-0.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.68	3.17	-0.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.42	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.14	3.17	-1.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.37	14.57	-6.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BAMG vs. ITOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAMG Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the ITOT Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAMG and ITOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BAMG	ITOT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.96	2.32	-0.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.74	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.82	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.45	0.57	+0.88

Drawdowns

BAMG vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAMG drawdown since its inception was -21.00%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAMG and ITOT.

Drawdown Indicators

	BAMG	ITOT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.00%	-55.20%	+34.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.08%	-8.90%	-4.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.44%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.36%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.29%	-0.73%	+0.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.51%	-6.97%	+4.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.34%	1.94%	+1.40%

Volatility

BAMG vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison

Brookstone Growth Stock ETF (BAMG) has a higher volatility of 3.68% compared to iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) at 2.99%. This indicates that BAMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ITOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BAMG	ITOT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.68%	2.99%	+0.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.86%	9.13%	+1.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.33%	12.20%	+2.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.97%	17.36%	-0.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.97%	18.26%	-1.29%

BAMG vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAMG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

BAMG vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison

BAMG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ITOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BAMG Brookstone Growth Stock ETF	0.00%	0.00%	1.24%	0.12%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF	0.98%	1.11%	1.23%	1.47%	1.66%	1.18%	1.41%	1.88%	2.14%	1.69%	1.83%	2.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BAMG and ITOT in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, BAMG and ITOT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, BAMG or ITOT?

BAMG has higher volatility (3.68%) compared to ITOT (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAMG dropped -21.00% vs ITOT's -55.20%.

Which ETF is better, BAMG or ITOT?

On 1-year performance, ITOT leads with 28.12% vs 27.89% for BAMG. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ITOT has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BAMG or ITOT?

Over the 1-year period, ITOT has performed better with a 28.12% return vs 27.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BAMG or ITOT?

ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BAMG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BAMG or ITOT?

ITOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.00% for BAMG.

What is the main difference between BAMG and ITOT?

BAMG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while ITOT is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Brookstone and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BAMG and 0.03% for ITOT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ITOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.