BAMG vs. BAMA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BAMG (Brookstone Growth Stock ETF) and BAMA (Brookstone Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BAMG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Brookstone, while BAMA is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Brookstone. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BAMG returned 27.89% vs 20.45% for BAMA. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BAMG charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for BAMA.

Performance

BAMG vs. BAMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookstone Growth Stock ETF (BAMG) and Brookstone Active ETF (BAMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAMG achieves a 10.74% return, which is significantly higher than BAMA's 8.76% return.

BAMG

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 8.86%
• YTD: 10.74%
• 6M: 10.41%
• 1Y: 27.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BAMA

• 1D: -0.63%
• 1M: 4.12%
• YTD: 8.76%
• 6M: 9.20%
• 1Y: 20.45%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAMG vs. BAMA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BAMG Brookstone Growth Stock ETF	10.74%	17.03%	24.01%	10.62%
BAMA Brookstone Active ETF	8.76%	12.61%	14.99%	8.02%

Correlation

The correlation between BAMG and BAMA is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2023	0.90

The correlation between BAMG and BAMA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

BAMG vs. BAMA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BAMG	BAMA
Technology	37.1%	36.8%
Healthcare	12.3%	6.9%
Communication Services	11.7%	11.3%
Financial Services	10.4%	13.7%
Industrials	9.8%	9.5%
Consumer Defensive	8.3%	3.5%
Consumer Cyclical	7.1%	9.5%
Utilities	2.0%	1.9%
Basic Materials	0.8%	2.9%
Energy	0.6%	2.5%
Real Estate	-	1.6%

Return for Risk

BAMG vs. BAMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAMG

BAMG Risk / Return Rank: 53
BAMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
BAMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
BAMG Omega Ratio Rank: 54
BAMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
BAMG Martin Ratio Rank: 50

BAMA

BAMA Risk / Return Rank: 68
BAMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
BAMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
BAMA Omega Ratio Rank: 71
BAMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
BAMA Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAMG vs. BAMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookstone Growth Stock ETF (BAMG) and Brookstone Active ETF (BAMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BAMG	BAMA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.96	2.24	-0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.68	3.25	-0.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.42	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.14	2.79	-0.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.37	12.82	-4.46
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BAMG vs. BAMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAMG Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the BAMA Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAMG and BAMA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BAMG	BAMA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.96	2.24	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.45	1.67	-0.22

Drawdowns

BAMG vs. BAMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAMG drawdown since its inception was -21.00%, which is greater than BAMA's maximum drawdown of -12.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAMG and BAMA.

Drawdown Indicators

	BAMG	BAMA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.00%	-12.27%	-8.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.08%	-7.35%	-5.73%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.29%	-0.63%	+0.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.51%	-1.26%	-1.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.34%	1.60%	+1.74%

Volatility

BAMG vs. BAMA - Volatility Comparison

Brookstone Growth Stock ETF (BAMG) has a higher volatility of 3.68% compared to Brookstone Active ETF (BAMA) at 3.16%. This indicates that BAMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BAMG	BAMA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.68%	3.16%	+0.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.86%	7.71%	+3.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.33%	9.17%	+5.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.97%	10.22%	+6.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.97%	10.22%	+6.75%

BAMG vs. BAMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAMG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than BAMA's 1.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

BAMG vs. BAMA - Dividend Comparison

BAMG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BAMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BAMA Brookstone Active ETF	1.31%	1.54%	1.49%	0.45%
BAMG Brookstone Growth Stock ETF	0.00%	0.00%	1.24%	0.12%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BAMG and BAMA in my portfolio?

BAMG and BAMA have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BAMG or BAMA?

BAMG has higher volatility (3.68%) compared to BAMA (3.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAMG dropped -21.00% vs BAMA's -12.27%.

Which ETF is better, BAMG or BAMA?

On 1-year performance, BAMG leads with 27.89% vs 20.45% for BAMA. On fees, BAMG is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BAMA has been the lower-risk option at 3.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BAMG or BAMA?

Over the 1-year period, BAMG has performed better with a 27.89% return vs 20.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BAMG or BAMA?

BAMG is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for BAMA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BAMG or BAMA?

BAMA has the higher dividend yield at 1.31%, compared with 0.00% for BAMG.

What is the main difference between BAMG and BAMA?

BAMG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while BAMA is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BAMG and 1.15% for BAMA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BAMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.