BAMA vs. EAOR

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Brookstone Active ETF (BAMA) and iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR).

BAMA and EAOR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BAMA is an actively managed fund by Brookstone. It was launched on Sep 27, 2023. EAOR is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the BlackRock ESG Aware Growth Allocation Index. It was launched on Jun 12, 2020.

Performance

BAMA vs. EAOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookstone Active ETF (BAMA) and iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BAMA vs. EAOR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BAMA Brookstone Active ETF	-2.54%	12.61%	14.99%	8.02%
EAOR iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF	-1.51%	15.59%	10.69%	9.29%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAMA achieves a -2.54% return, which is significantly lower than EAOR's -1.51% return.

BAMA

• 1D: 2.22%
• 1M: -4.58%
• YTD: -2.54%
• 6M: -0.48%
• 1Y: 12.51%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EAOR

• 1D: 1.89%
• 1M: -4.45%
• YTD: -1.51%
• 6M: 0.75%
• 1Y: 13.98%
• 3Y*: 11.11%
• 5Y*: 5.30%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAMA vs. EAOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAMA has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than EAOR's 0.18% expense ratio.

BAMA

Brookstone Active ETF

EAOR

iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF

Return for Risk

BAMA vs. EAOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAMA

BAMA Risk / Return Rank: 61
BAMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
BAMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
BAMA Omega Ratio Rank: 60
BAMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
BAMA Martin Ratio Rank: 66

EAOR

EAOR Risk / Return Rank: 73
EAOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
EAOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
EAOR Omega Ratio Rank: 72
EAOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
EAOR Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAMA vs. EAOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookstone Active ETF (BAMA) and iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BAMA	EAOR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.03	1.27	-0.23
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.56	1.85	-0.29
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.27	-0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.64	1.81	-0.17
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.89	8.06	-1.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BAMA vs. EAOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAMA Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is comparable to the EAOR Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAMA and EAOR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BAMA	EAOR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.03	1.27	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.51	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.31	0.74	+0.57

Correlation

The correlation between BAMA and EAOR is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

BAMA vs. EAOR - Dividend Comparison

BAMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than EAOR's 2.48% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BAMA Brookstone Active ETF	1.58%	1.54%	1.49%	0.45%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EAOR iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF	2.48%	2.45%	2.52%	2.39%	1.99%	1.39%	1.07%

Drawdowns

BAMA vs. EAOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAMA drawdown since its inception was -12.27%, smaller than the maximum EAOR drawdown of -22.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAMA and EAOR.

Drawdown Indicators

	BAMA	EAOR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.27%	-22.91%	+10.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.89%	-7.80%	-0.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.91%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.30%	-4.80%	-0.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.29%	-5.18%	+3.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.88%	1.75%	+0.13%

Volatility

BAMA vs. EAOR - Volatility Comparison

Brookstone Active ETF (BAMA) has a higher volatility of 4.68% compared to iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR) at 4.28%. This indicates that BAMA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EAOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BAMA	EAOR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.68%	4.28%	+0.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.11%	6.59%	+0.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.17%	11.09%	+1.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.15%	10.46%	-0.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.15%	10.41%	-0.26%