BAM.TO vs. TSU.TO
BAM.TO (Brookfield Asset Management Ltd) and TSU.TO (Trisura Group Ltd.) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — BAM.TO in Asset Management, TSU.TO in Insurance - Specialty. Over the past 3 years, BAM.TO returned 18.57%/yr vs 4.15%/yr for TSU.TO. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BAM.TO vs. TSU.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BAM.TO achieves a -6.38% return, which is significantly lower than TSU.TO's -0.16% return.
BAM.TO
- 1D
- 1.48%
- 1M
- -1.81%
- YTD
- -6.38%
- 6M
- -9.11%
- 1Y
- -7.86%
- 3Y*
- 18.57%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSU.TO
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 3.95%
- YTD
- -0.16%
- 6M
- 6.79%
- 1Y
- 6.33%
- 3Y*
- 4.15%
- 5Y*
- 1.34%
- 10Y*
- —
BAM.TO vs. TSU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAM.TO Brookfield Asset Management Ltd | -6.38% | -4.85% | 51.69% | 42.64% | 33.69% |
TSU.TO Trisura Group Ltd. | -0.16% | 9.59% | 14.65% | -24.93% | 5.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between BAM.TO and TSU.TO is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2022 | 0.28 |
Fundamentals
BAM.TO:
CA$107.08B
TSU.TO:
CA$2.07B
BAM.TO:
$1.54
TSU.TO:
CA$3.11
BAM.TO:
30.56
TSU.TO:
13.73
BAM.TO:
0.05
TSU.TO:
0.34
BAM.TO:
15.53
TSU.TO:
0.65
BAM.TO:
8.91
TSU.TO:
2.18
BAM.TO:
$4.94B
TSU.TO:
CA$3.19B
BAM.TO:
$3.48B
TSU.TO:
CA$2.49B
BAM.TO:
$3.14B
TSU.TO:
CA$208.91M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BAM.TO vs. TSU.TO — Risk / Return Rank
BAM.TO
TSU.TO
BAM.TO vs. TSU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Asset Management Ltd (BAM.TO) and Trisura Group Ltd. (TSU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BAM.TO | TSU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.06 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.35 | 0.31 | -0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.64 | 0.53 | -1.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BAM.TO vs. TSU.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAM.TO drawdown since its inception was -30.80%, smaller than the maximum TSU.TO drawdown of -40.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAM.TO and TSU.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BAM.TO | TSU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.80% | -40.06% | +9.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.31% | -18.33% | -11.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.80% | -31.85% | +1.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -40.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.54% | -14.05% | -7.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.24% | -14.34% | +5.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.31% | 10.44% | +5.87% |
Volatility
BAM.TO vs. TSU.TO - Volatility Comparison
Brookfield Asset Management Ltd (BAM.TO) has a higher volatility of 9.78% compared to Trisura Group Ltd. (TSU.TO) at 4.11%. This indicates that BAM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BAM.TO | TSU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.78% | 4.11% | +5.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.05% | 21.80% | +0.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.95% | 27.85% | +1.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.28% | 33.08% | +8.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.28% | 33.66% | +7.62% |
Dividends
BAM.TO vs. TSU.TO - Dividend Comparison
BAM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, while TSU.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BAM.TO Brookfield Asset Management Ltd | 3.93% | 3.40% | 2.67% | 3.27% |
TSU.TO Trisura Group Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
BAM.TO vs. TSU.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brookfield Asset Management Ltd and Trisura Group Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BAM.TO vs. TSU.TO - Profitability Comparison
BAM.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Asset Management Ltd reported a gross profit of 1.06B and revenue of 1.32B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 80.7%.
TSU.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Trisura Group Ltd. reported a gross profit of 806.81M and revenue of 806.81M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
BAM.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Asset Management Ltd reported an operating income of 595.08M and revenue of 1.32B, resulting in an operating margin of 45.2%.
TSU.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Trisura Group Ltd. reported an operating income of 48.61M and revenue of 806.81M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.0%.
BAM.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Asset Management Ltd reported a net income of 606.89M and revenue of 1.32B, resulting in a net margin of 46.1%.
TSU.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Trisura Group Ltd. reported a net income of 37.41M and revenue of 806.81M, resulting in a net margin of 4.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BAM.TO and TSU.TO have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for BAM.TO and TSU.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer