BAM.TO vs. IONQ
BAM.TO (Brookfield Asset Management Ltd) and IONQ (IonQ, Inc.) are both stocks. BAM.TO operates in Asset Management (Financial Services), while IONQ operates in Computer Hardware (Technology). Over the past 3 years, BAM.TO returned 18.57%/yr vs 78.53%/yr for IONQ. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BAM.TO vs. IONQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BAM.TO is traded in CAD, while IONQ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IONQ values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BAM.TO achieves a -6.38% return, which is significantly lower than IONQ's 31.54% return.
BAM.TO
- 1D
- 1.48%
- 1M
- -1.81%
- YTD
- -6.38%
- 6M
- -9.11%
- 1Y
- -7.86%
- 3Y*
- 18.57%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IONQ
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 2.63%
- YTD
- 31.54%
- 6M
- 16.54%
- 1Y
- 57.11%
- 3Y*
- 78.53%
- 5Y*
- 44.61%
- 10Y*
- —
BAM.TO vs. IONQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAM.TO Brookfield Asset Management Ltd | -6.38% | -4.85% | 51.69% | 42.64% | 33.69% |
IONQ IonQ, Inc. | 31.54% | 2.52% | 265.67% | 250.59% | -33.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between BAM.TO and IONQ is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2022 | 0.32 |
Fundamentals
BAM.TO:
CA$107.08B
IONQ:
$21.48B
BAM.TO:
$1.54
IONQ:
$0.86
BAM.TO:
30.56
IONQ:
67.11
BAM.TO:
15.53
IONQ:
99.37
BAM.TO:
8.91
IONQ:
4.32
BAM.TO:
$4.94B
IONQ:
$187.12M
BAM.TO:
$3.48B
IONQ:
$71.25M
BAM.TO:
$3.14B
IONQ:
$405.86M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BAM.TO vs. IONQ — Risk / Return Rank
BAM.TO
IONQ
BAM.TO vs. IONQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Asset Management Ltd (BAM.TO) and IonQ, Inc. (IONQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BAM.TO | IONQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.16 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.35 | 0.78 | -1.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.64 | 1.40 | -2.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BAM.TO vs. IONQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAM.TO drawdown since its inception was -30.80%, smaller than the maximum IONQ drawdown of -89.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAM.TO and IONQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BAM.TO | IONQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.80% | -89.21% | +58.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.31% | -67.84% | +37.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.80% | -67.84% | +37.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -89.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.54% | -29.66% | +8.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.24% | -50.36% | +41.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.31% | 37.76% | -21.45% |
Volatility
BAM.TO vs. IONQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Brookfield Asset Management Ltd (BAM.TO) is 9.78%, while IonQ, Inc. (IONQ) has a volatility of 31.60%. This indicates that BAM.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IONQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BAM.TO | IONQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.78% | 31.60% | -21.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.05% | 68.87% | -46.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.95% | 93.24% | -64.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.28% | 100.62% | -59.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.28% | 97.74% | -56.46% |
Dividends
BAM.TO vs. IONQ - Dividend Comparison
BAM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, while IONQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BAM.TO Brookfield Asset Management Ltd | 3.93% | 3.40% | 2.67% | 3.27% |
IONQ IonQ, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
BAM.TO vs. IONQ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brookfield Asset Management Ltd and IonQ, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
BAM.TO and IONQ have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for BAM.TO and IONQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer