BALL vs. IBM
BALL (Ball Corporation) and IBM (International Business Machines Corporation) are both stocks. BALL operates in Packaging & Containers (Consumer Cyclical), while IBM operates in Information Technology Services (Technology). Over the past 10 years, BALL returned 5.84%/yr vs 11.09%/yr for IBM. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BALL vs. IBM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BALL achieves a 8.29% return, which is significantly higher than IBM's -6.89% return. Over the past 10 years, BALL has underperformed IBM with an annualized return of 5.84%, while IBM has yielded a comparatively higher 11.09% annualized return.
BALL
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- 3.60%
- YTD
- 8.29%
- 6M
- 12.67%
- 1Y
- 6.33%
- 3Y*
- 3.03%
- 5Y*
- -5.69%
- 10Y*
- 5.84%
IBM
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- 24.14%
- YTD
- -6.89%
- 6M
- -10.81%
- 1Y
- 0.72%
- 3Y*
- 29.65%
- 5Y*
- 18.01%
- 10Y*
- 11.09%
BALL vs. IBM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BALL Ball Corporation | 8.29% | -2.43% | -2.96% | 14.15% | -46.23% | 4.12% | 45.19% | 41.83% | 22.65% | 1.79% |
IBM International Business Machines Corporation | -6.89% | 38.23% | 39.27% | 21.85% | 10.64% | 16.65% | -1.16% | 23.58% | -22.56% | -3.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between BALL and IBM is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 1984 | 0.28 |
Over the past year, the correlation between BALL and IBM has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.28, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
BALL:
$15.24B
IBM:
$259.20B
BALL:
$3.45
IBM:
$11.32
BALL:
16.52
IBM:
24.05
BALL:
0.17
IBM:
0.29
BALL:
1.13
IBM:
3.75
BALL:
2.12
IBM:
7.86
BALL:
$13.64B
IBM:
$68.91B
BALL:
$1.50B
IBM:
$40.64B
BALL:
$1.65B
IBM:
$15.71B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BALL vs. IBM — Risk / Return Rank
BALL
IBM
BALL vs. IBM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ball Corporation (BALL) and International Business Machines Corporation (IBM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BALL | IBM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.04 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.22 | -0.02 | +0.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.38 | -0.05 | +0.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BALL vs. IBM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BALL drawdown since its inception was -55.09%, smaller than the maximum IBM drawdown of -69.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BALL and IBM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BALL | IBM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.09% | -69.40% | +14.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.96% | -30.96% | +9.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.62% | -30.96% | -4.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.09% | -30.96% | -24.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.09% | -40.59% | -14.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.91% | -17.31% | -20.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.49% | -20.12% | +3.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.70% | 14.38% | -1.68% |
Volatility
BALL vs. IBM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ball Corporation (BALL) is 7.41%, while International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) has a volatility of 21.43%. This indicates that BALL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BALL | IBM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.41% | 21.43% | -14.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.80% | 34.62% | -14.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.16% | 39.45% | -13.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.42% | 27.16% | +3.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.33% | 26.59% | +1.74% |
Dividends
BALL vs. IBM - Dividend Comparison
BALL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, less than IBM's 2.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BALL Ball Corporation | 1.40% | 1.51% | 1.45% | 1.39% | 1.56% | 0.73% | 0.64% | 0.85% | 0.87% | 0.96% | 0.69% | 0.71% |
IBM International Business Machines Corporation | 2.47% | 2.27% | 3.03% | 4.05% | 4.68% | 4.74% | 5.17% | 4.80% | 5.46% | 3.85% | 3.31% | 3.63% |
Financials
BALL vs. IBM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ball Corporation and International Business Machines Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BALL vs. IBM - Profitability Comparison
BALL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ball Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.60B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
IBM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, International Business Machines Corporation reported a gross profit of 8.95B and revenue of 15.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.2%.
BALL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ball Corporation reported an operating income of 205.00M and revenue of 3.60B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.7%.
IBM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, International Business Machines Corporation reported an operating income of 1.22B and revenue of 15.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.6%.
BALL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ball Corporation reported a net income of 205.00M and revenue of 3.60B, resulting in a net margin of 5.7%.
IBM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, International Business Machines Corporation reported a net income of 1.22B and revenue of 15.92B, resulting in a net margin of 7.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BALL and IBM have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBM has higher volatility (21.43%) compared to BALL (7.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BALL dropped -55.09% vs IBM's -69.40%.
BALL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.19 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BALL and IBM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer