PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BALFX vs. GFFFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BALFX vs. GFFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds American Balanced Fund Class F-1 (BALFX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class F-2 (GFFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BALFX achieves a 8.18% return, which is significantly higher than GFFFX's 4.51% return. Over the past 10 years, BALFX has underperformed GFFFX with an annualized return of 9.67%, while GFFFX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.27% annualized return.


BALFX

1D
1.08%
1M
-0.98%
6M
5.43%
YTD
8.18%
1Y
18.29%
3Y*
15.33%
5Y*
8.97%
10Y*
9.67%
ALL TIME*
7.86%

GFFFX

1D
1.91%
1M
-3.24%
6M
3.86%
YTD
4.51%
1Y
13.10%
3Y*
19.90%
5Y*
10.33%
10Y*
15.27%
ALL TIME*
14.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

BALFX vs. GFFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BALFX
American Funds American Balanced Fund Class F-1
8.18%18.40%14.91%13.62%-12.19%15.69%10.81%18.50%-3.54%14.63%
GFFFX
American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class F-2
4.51%19.96%28.28%37.51%-30.61%19.55%38.16%28.43%-2.96%26.38%

Correlation

The correlation between BALFX and GFFFX is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2009

0.92

The correlation between BALFX and GFFFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BALFX vs. GFFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BALFX
BALFX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
BALFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BALFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
BALFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
BALFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
BALFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

GFFFX
GFFFX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
GFFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
GFFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BALFX vs. GFFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds American Balanced Fund Class F-1 (BALFX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class F-2 (GFFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BALFXGFFFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.13

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

0.82

+1.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.42

2.96

+7.46

BALFX vs. GFFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BALFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is higher than the GFFFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BALFX and GFFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BALFX vs. GFFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BALFX drawdown since its inception was -40.20%, which is greater than GFFFX's maximum drawdown of -36.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BALFX and GFFFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BALFXGFFFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.20%

-36.26%

-3.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.03%

-13.74%

+6.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.67%

-21.55%

+10.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.81%

-36.26%

+17.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.34%

-36.26%

+13.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.71%

-5.45%

+3.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.14%

-5.55%

+1.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.65%

3.78%

-2.13%

Volatility

BALFX vs. GFFFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds American Balanced Fund Class F-1 (BALFX) is 2.33%, while American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class F-2 (GFFFX) has a volatility of 4.82%. This indicates that BALFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GFFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BALFXGFFFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.33%

4.82%

-2.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.38%

13.65%

-6.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.42%

16.91%

-7.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.59%

20.53%

-9.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.69%

19.76%

-9.07%

BALFX vs. GFFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BALFX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than GFFFX's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

BALFX vs. GFFFX - Dividend Comparison

BALFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.15%, less than GFFFX's 10.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BALFX
American Funds American Balanced Fund Class F-1
7.15%8.22%7.14%2.02%2.24%4.24%4.31%3.44%5.30%4.66%4.18%5.54%
GFFFX
American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class F-2
10.48%10.95%9.23%7.64%4.32%8.42%4.51%7.38%12.29%7.27%6.87%9.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, BALFX and GFFFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GFFFX has higher volatility (4.82%) compared to BALFX (2.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BALFX dropped -40.20% vs GFFFX's -36.26%.

BALFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BALFX and GFFFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer