BAI vs. SLV

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares A.I. Innovation and Tech Active ETF (BAI) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV).

BAI and SLV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BAI is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on Oct 21, 2024. SLV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the LBMA Silver Price. It was launched on Apr 21, 2006.

Performance

BAI vs. SLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares A.I. Innovation and Tech Active ETF (BAI) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BAI vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BAI iShares A.I. Innovation and Tech Active ETF	-1.05%	25.22%	8.06%
SLV iShares Silver Trust	5.77%	144.66%	-17.04%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAI achieves a -1.05% return, which is significantly lower than SLV's 5.77% return.

BAI

• 1D: 5.71%
• 1M: -5.88%
• YTD: -1.05%
• 6M: -1.80%
• 1Y: 53.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SLV

• 1D: 7.27%
• 1M: -19.83%
• YTD: 5.77%
• 6M: 60.82%
• 1Y: 119.88%
• 3Y*: 45.50%
• 5Y*: 24.10%
• 10Y*: 16.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAI vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAI has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.

BAI

iShares A.I. Innovation and Tech Active ETF

SLV

iShares Silver Trust

Return for Risk

BAI vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAI

BAI Risk / Return Rank: 80
BAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
BAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
BAI Omega Ratio Rank: 74
BAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
BAI Martin Ratio Rank: 76

SLV

SLV Risk / Return Rank: 89
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 92
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAI vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares A.I. Innovation and Tech Active ETF (BAI) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BAI	SLV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.54	2.11	-0.58
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.07	2.20	-0.13
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.39	-0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.17	2.82	+0.35
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.33	8.79	-0.46
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BAI vs. SLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAI Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the SLV Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAI and SLV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BAI	SLV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.54	2.11	-0.58
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.69	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.54	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.66	0.25	+0.41

Correlation

The correlation between BAI and SLV is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

BAI vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison

BAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025
BAI iShares A.I. Innovation and Tech Active ETF	1.81%	1.80%
SLV iShares Silver Trust	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

BAI vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAI drawdown since its inception was -34.09%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAI and SLV.

Drawdown Indicators

	BAI	SLV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.09%	-76.28%	+42.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.22%	-42.45%	+26.23%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-42.45%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-42.81%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.44%	-35.47%	+24.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.57%	-44.76%	+37.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.17%	13.63%	-7.46%

Volatility

BAI vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares A.I. Innovation and Tech Active ETF (BAI) is 14.66%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 18.91%. This indicates that BAI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BAI	SLV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.66%	18.91%	-4.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.45%	57.27%	-31.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.89%	57.07%	-22.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.51%	35.28%	-0.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.51%	31.36%	+3.15%