PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAH vs. TCEHY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BAH vs. TCEHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) and Tencent Holdings Limited (TCEHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAH achieves a -5.07% return, which is significantly higher than TCEHY's -24.74% return. Over the past 10 years, BAH has outperformed TCEHY with an annualized return of 12.45%, while TCEHY has yielded a comparatively lower 11.05% annualized return.


BAH

1D
-0.66%
1M
3.17%
YTD
-5.07%
6M
-9.00%
1Y
-21.11%
3Y*
-6.67%
5Y*
0.36%
10Y*
12.45%

TCEHY

1D
-2.11%
1M
-3.69%
YTD
-24.74%
6M
-26.31%
1Y
-12.73%
3Y*
10.74%
5Y*
-4.22%
10Y*
11.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAH vs. TCEHY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BAH
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
-5.07%-33.02%2.00%24.47%25.71%-1.04%24.46%60.16%20.21%7.77%
TCEHY
Tencent Holdings Limited
-24.74%45.23%41.92%-5.48%-24.97%-18.69%50.09%21.93%-23.83%115.30%

Correlation

The correlation between BAH and TCEHY is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2010

0.18

The correlation between BAH and TCEHY shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BAH:

$9.60B

TCEHY:

$522.40B

EPS

BAH:

$6.91

TCEHY:

$25.30

PE Ratio

BAH:

11.51

TCEHY:

2.25

PEG Ratio

BAH:

0.33

TCEHY:

0.28

PS Ratio

BAH:

0.87

TCEHY:

0.69

PB Ratio

BAH:

8.68

TCEHY:

0.47

Total Revenue (TTM)

BAH:

$11.22B

TCEHY:

$763.32B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BAH:

$4.99B

TCEHY:

$422.60B

EBITDA (TTM)

BAH:

$1.11B

TCEHY:

$324.78B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BAH vs. TCEHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAH
BAH Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
BAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAH Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
BAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAH Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

TCEHY
TCEHY Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
TCEHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCEHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCEHY Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
TCEHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCEHY Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAH vs. TCEHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) and Tencent Holdings Limited (TCEHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BAHTCEHYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

0.95

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.55

-0.34

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.91

-0.74

-0.17

BAH vs. TCEHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAH Sharpe Ratio is -0.54, which is lower than the TCEHY Sharpe Ratio of -0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAH and TCEHY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BAHTCEHYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.54

-0.40

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

-0.10

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.29

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.64

-0.07

Drawdowns

BAH vs. TCEHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAH drawdown since its inception was -60.24%, smaller than the maximum TCEHY drawdown of -73.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAH and TCEHY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BAHTCEHYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.24%

-73.17%

+12.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.07%

-36.75%

-0.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-60.24%

-36.75%

-23.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.24%

-66.18%

+5.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.24%

-73.17%

+12.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-55.85%

-35.11%

-20.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.70%

-19.67%

+8.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.35%

16.81%

+5.54%

Volatility

BAH vs. TCEHY - Volatility Comparison

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) and Tencent Holdings Limited (TCEHY) have volatilities of 12.36% and 12.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BAHTCEHYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.36%

12.85%

-0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.87%

24.49%

+7.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.77%

30.74%

+7.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.00%

43.22%

-12.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.66%

38.83%

-10.17%

Dividends

BAH vs. TCEHY - Dividend Comparison

BAH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, more than TCEHY's 1.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BAH
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
2.82%2.61%1.59%1.47%1.65%1.75%1.42%1.35%1.69%1.78%1.66%1.69%
TCEHY
Tencent Holdings Limited
1.19%0.76%0.82%6.67%4.15%0.35%0.19%0.23%0.26%0.29%0.51%0.21%

Financials

BAH vs. TCEHY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation and Tencent Holdings Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B200.00B20222023202420252026
2.78B
195.27B
(BAH) Total Revenue
(TCEHY) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BAH vs. TCEHY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation and Tencent Holdings Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
20.9%
54.6%
Portfolio components
BAH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation reported a gross profit of 581.00M and revenue of 2.78B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.9%.

TCEHY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tencent Holdings Limited reported a gross profit of 106.58B and revenue of 195.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.6%.

BAH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation reported an operating income of 263.00M and revenue of 2.78B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.5%.

TCEHY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tencent Holdings Limited reported an operating income of 65.72B and revenue of 195.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 33.7%.

BAH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation reported a net income of 205.00M and revenue of 2.78B, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.

TCEHY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tencent Holdings Limited reported a net income of 57.74B and revenue of 195.27B, resulting in a net margin of 29.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BAH and TCEHY have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TCEHY has higher volatility (12.85%) compared to BAH (12.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAH dropped -60.24% vs TCEHY's -73.17%.

TCEHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.40 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BAH and TCEHY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer