BAGY vs. SLJY

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BAGY (Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF) and SLJY (Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from Amplify. Both are actively managed. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BAGY charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for SLJY.

Performance

BAGY vs. SLJY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF (BAGY) and Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF (SLJY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAGY achieves a -21.90% return, which is significantly lower than SLJY's 7.71% return.

BAGY

• 1D: -2.73%
• 1M: -20.28%
• YTD: -21.90%
• 6M: -24.70%
• 1Y: -37.04%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SLJY

• 1D: -4.01%
• 1M: 3.34%
• YTD: 7.71%
• 6M: 15.56%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAGY vs. SLJY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BAGY Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF	-21.90%	-24.89%
SLJY Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF	7.71%	43.38%

Correlation

The correlation between BAGY and SLJY is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025	0.25

Return for Risk

BAGY vs. SLJY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAGY

BAGY Risk / Return Rank: 2
BAGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BAGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BAGY Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BAGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BAGY Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAGY vs. SLJY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF (BAGY) and Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF (SLJY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BAGY	SLJY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.89	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.20	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.86	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.78	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.41	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BAGY	SLJY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.89	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.66	1.49	-2.15

Drawdowns

BAGY vs. SLJY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAGY drawdown since its inception was -47.52%, which is greater than SLJY's maximum drawdown of -30.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAGY and SLJY.

Drawdown Indicators

	BAGY	SLJY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.52%	-30.60%	-16.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-47.52%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-45.06%	-21.65%	-23.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.61%	-9.60%	-10.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	26.28%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BAGY	SLJY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.89%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.39%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.93%	49.59%	-7.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.86%	49.59%	-8.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.86%	49.59%	-8.73%

BAGY vs. SLJY - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAGY has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than SLJY's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

BAGY vs. SLJY - Dividend Comparison

BAGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 58.25%, more than SLJY's 16.71% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
BAGY Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF	58.25%	30.16%
SLJY Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF	16.71%	6.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BAGY and SLJY in my portfolio?

BAGY and SLJY have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BAGY or SLJY?

On fees, BAGY is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BAGY or SLJY?

BAGY is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SLJY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BAGY or SLJY?

BAGY has the higher dividend yield at 58.25%, compared with 16.71% for SLJY.

What is the main difference between BAGY and SLJY?

Their fees differ too: 0.65% for BAGY and 0.75% for SLJY.