PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAFWX vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BAFWX vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund Institutional Shares (BAFWX) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAFWX achieves a 7.08% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 19.01% return. Over the past 10 years, BAFWX has outperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 15.79%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively lower 12.77% annualized return.


BAFWX

1D
-0.16%
1M
9.41%
YTD
7.08%
6M
6.03%
1Y
10.33%
3Y*
15.35%
5Y*
9.85%
10Y*
15.79%

SCHD

1D
0.00%
1M
2.70%
YTD
19.01%
6M
18.63%
1Y
27.16%
3Y*
15.09%
5Y*
8.36%
10Y*
12.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAFWX vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BAFWX
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund Institutional Shares
7.08%3.35%20.35%39.07%-30.90%30.01%39.09%36.09%4.51%28.10%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
19.01%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between BAFWX and SCHD is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2012

0.64

Over the past year, the correlation between BAFWX and SCHD has dropped to 0.18 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BAFWX vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAFWX
BAFWX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
BAFWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAFWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAFWX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
BAFWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAFWX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAFWX vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund Institutional Shares (BAFWX) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BAFWXSCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.45

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.54

5.91

-5.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.41

14.53

-13.12

BAFWX vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAFWX Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is lower than the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAFWX and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BAFWXSCHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

2.49

-1.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.58

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

0.77

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.86

-0.06

Drawdowns

BAFWX vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAFWX drawdown since its inception was -36.86%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAFWX and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BAFWXSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.86%

-33.37%

-3.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.93%

-4.61%

-15.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.03%

-16.13%

-8.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.86%

-16.85%

-20.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.86%

-33.37%

-3.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-1.40%

+1.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.71%

-3.32%

-2.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.64%

1.88%

+5.76%

Volatility

BAFWX vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund Institutional Shares (BAFWX) has a higher volatility of 4.49% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.66%. This indicates that BAFWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BAFWXSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.49%

2.66%

+1.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.16%

7.66%

+5.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.55%

10.96%

+5.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.62%

14.38%

+8.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.51%

16.72%

+4.79%

BAFWX vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAFWX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

BAFWX vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

BAFWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.26%, more than SCHD's 3.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BAFWX
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund Institutional Shares
22.26%23.83%5.23%0.01%0.00%1.82%0.00%1.48%3.71%1.70%0.71%4.73%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.26%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


BAFWX and SCHD have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BAFWX has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to SCHD (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAFWX dropped -36.86% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BAFWX and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer