BAFWX vs. GGRO.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund Institutional Shares (BAFWX) and iShares ESG Growth ETF Portfolio (GGRO.TO).
BAFWX is managed by Brown Advisory Funds. It was launched on Jun 29, 2012. GGRO.TO is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on Sep 2, 2020.
Performance
BAFWX vs. GGRO.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BAFWX vs. GGRO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAFWX Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund Institutional Shares | -12.45% | 3.35% | 20.35% | 39.07% | -30.90% | 30.01% | 13.32% |
GGRO.TO iShares ESG Growth ETF Portfolio | -2.01% | 19.71% | 10.97% | 21.90% | -19.86% | 16.37% | 10.93% |
Different Trading Currencies
BAFWX is traded in USD, while GGRO.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the GGRO.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BAFWX achieves a -12.45% return, which is significantly lower than GGRO.TO's -2.01% return.
BAFWX
- 1D
- 3.28%
- 1M
- -4.61%
- YTD
- -12.45%
- 6M
- -15.24%
- 1Y
- -0.19%
- 3Y*
- 9.80%
- 5Y*
- 5.96%
- 10Y*
- 13.77%
GGRO.TO
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- -4.74%
- YTD
- -2.01%
- 6M
- -1.37%
- 1Y
- 17.95%
- 3Y*
- 13.92%
- 5Y*
- 6.98%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BAFWX vs. GGRO.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BAFWX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than GGRO.TO's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BAFWX vs. GGRO.TO — Risk / Return Rank
BAFWX
GGRO.TO
BAFWX vs. GGRO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund Institutional Shares (BAFWX) and iShares ESG Growth ETF Portfolio (GGRO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BAFWX | GGRO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.02 | 1.26 | -1.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.20 | 1.74 | -1.54 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.24 | -0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.03 | 2.05 | -2.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.09 | 7.90 | -7.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BAFWX | GGRO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 | 1.26 | -1.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.49 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.66 | +0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between BAFWX and GGRO.TO is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BAFWX vs. GGRO.TO - Dividend Comparison
BAFWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 27.22%, more than GGRO.TO's 1.56% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAFWX Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund Institutional Shares | 27.22% | 23.83% | 5.23% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 1.82% | 0.00% | 1.48% | 3.71% | 1.70% | 0.71% | 4.73% |
GGRO.TO iShares ESG Growth ETF Portfolio | 1.56% | 1.51% | 1.62% | 1.89% | 1.69% | 1.43% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BAFWX vs. GGRO.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAFWX drawdown since its inception was -36.86%, which is greater than GGRO.TO's maximum drawdown of -28.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAFWX and GGRO.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BAFWX | GGRO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.86% | -22.13% | -14.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.93% | -8.65% | -11.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.86% | -22.13% | -14.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.22% | -4.22% | -13.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.69% | -5.10% | -0.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.96% | 2.32% | +4.64% |
Volatility
BAFWX vs. GGRO.TO - Volatility Comparison
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund Institutional Shares (BAFWX) has a higher volatility of 6.50% compared to iShares ESG Growth ETF Portfolio (GGRO.TO) at 5.94%. This indicates that BAFWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGRO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BAFWX | GGRO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.50% | 5.94% | +0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.97% | 10.34% | +2.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.91% | 14.31% | +8.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.60% | 14.34% | +8.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.44% | 14.29% | +7.15% |