BACIX vs. GAGEX
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund (BACIX) and Guinness Atkinson Global Energy Fund (GAGEX).
BACIX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Feb 15, 2005. GAGEX is managed by Guinness Atkinson. It was launched on Jun 29, 2004.
Performance
BACIX vs. GAGEX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BACIX vs. GAGEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BACIX BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund | 35.86% | 11.03% | 4.23% | 2.97% | 43.64% | 43.50% | -29.38% | 13.04% | -19.55% | 2.47% |
GAGEX Guinness Atkinson Global Energy Fund | 37.85% | 16.88% | -1.75% | 2.66% | 34.32% | 45.96% | -34.12% | 10.45% | -18.96% | -1.04% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BACIX achieves a 35.86% return, which is significantly lower than GAGEX's 37.85% return. Over the past 10 years, BACIX has outperformed GAGEX with an annualized return of 10.51%, while GAGEX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.75% annualized return.
BACIX
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 8.19%
- YTD
- 35.86%
- 6M
- 38.86%
- 1Y
- 38.10%
- 3Y*
- 18.79%
- 5Y*
- 22.31%
- 10Y*
- 10.51%
GAGEX
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- 10.00%
- YTD
- 37.85%
- 6M
- 40.91%
- 1Y
- 46.83%
- 3Y*
- 19.07%
- 5Y*
- 20.53%
- 10Y*
- 8.75%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BACIX vs. GAGEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BACIX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than GAGEX's 1.46% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BACIX vs. GAGEX — Risk / Return Rank
BACIX
GAGEX
BACIX vs. GAGEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund (BACIX) and Guinness Atkinson Global Energy Fund (GAGEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BACIX | GAGEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.82 | 2.22 | -0.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.21 | 2.71 | -0.50 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.40 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.23 | 2.63 | -0.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.47 | 9.38 | -1.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BACIX | GAGEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.82 | 2.22 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 | 0.88 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | 0.32 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.25 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between BACIX and GAGEX is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BACIX vs. GAGEX - Dividend Comparison
BACIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, which matches GAGEX's 2.05% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BACIX BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund | 2.06% | 2.79% | 2.63% | 3.39% | 2.49% | 2.67% | 3.66% | 3.06% | 3.43% | 2.76% | 2.38% | 2.51% |
GAGEX Guinness Atkinson Global Energy Fund | 2.05% | 2.82% | 7.08% | 4.33% | 0.15% | 2.59% | 3.59% | 1.91% | 1.72% | 1.40% | 1.13% | 1.33% |
Drawdowns
BACIX vs. GAGEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BACIX drawdown since its inception was -77.81%, roughly equal to the maximum GAGEX drawdown of -78.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BACIX and GAGEX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BACIX | GAGEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.81% | -78.90% | +1.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.60% | -18.43% | +0.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.76% | -26.42% | +0.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.65% | -69.98% | +4.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.81% | -0.71% | -0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.58% | -29.42% | -3.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.26% | 5.18% | +0.08% |
Volatility
BACIX vs. GAGEX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund (BACIX) is 4.16%, while Guinness Atkinson Global Energy Fund (GAGEX) has a volatility of 4.61%. This indicates that BACIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GAGEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BACIX | GAGEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.16% | 4.61% | -0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.43% | 12.36% | -0.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.53% | 21.53% | 0.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.61% | 23.56% | +0.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.16% | 27.31% | -0.15% |