PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BACIX vs. DHIVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BACIX vs. DHIVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund (BACIX) and Centre Global Infrastructure Fund (DHIVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BACIX achieves a 27.38% return, which is significantly higher than DHIVX's 11.02% return.


BACIX

1D
1.44%
1M
-3.48%
YTD
27.38%
6M
28.05%
1Y
41.22%
3Y*
17.06%
5Y*
18.61%
10Y*
8.92%

DHIVX

1D
-0.21%
1M
-2.05%
YTD
11.02%
6M
11.28%
1Y
14.73%
3Y*
18.30%
5Y*
9.08%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BACIX vs. DHIVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BACIX
BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund
27.38%11.03%4.23%2.97%43.64%43.50%-29.38%13.04%-14.00%
DHIVX
Centre Global Infrastructure Fund
11.02%16.30%20.25%5.34%-3.28%7.51%-7.17%25.27%-4.07%

Correlation

The correlation between BACIX and DHIVX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2018

0.59

Over the past year, the correlation between BACIX and DHIVX has dropped to 0.29 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BACIX vs. DHIVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BACIX
BACIX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
BACIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BACIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
BACIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
BACIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
BACIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

DHIVX
DHIVX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
DHIVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHIVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHIVX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
DHIVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHIVX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BACIX vs. DHIVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund (BACIX) and Centre Global Infrastructure Fund (DHIVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BACIXDHIVXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.53

1.59

+0.94

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.21

2.41

+0.80

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.29

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.75

3.72

+1.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.30

7.83

+6.47

BACIX vs. DHIVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BACIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is higher than the DHIVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BACIX and DHIVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BACIXDHIVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53

1.59

+0.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.74

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.56

-0.36

Drawdowns

BACIX vs. DHIVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BACIX drawdown since its inception was -77.81%, which is greater than DHIVX's maximum drawdown of -36.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BACIX and DHIVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BACIXDHIVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.81%

-36.18%

-41.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.03%

-4.37%

-4.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.44%

-9.92%

-8.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.76%

-20.41%

-5.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.00%

-3.56%

-3.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.37%

-5.59%

-26.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

2.07%

+0.93%

Volatility

BACIX vs. DHIVX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund (BACIX) has a higher volatility of 6.87% compared to Centre Global Infrastructure Fund (DHIVX) at 2.98%. This indicates that BACIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DHIVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BACIXDHIVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.87%

2.98%

+3.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.09%

7.65%

+6.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.24%

9.73%

+7.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.53%

12.35%

+11.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.20%

14.68%

+12.52%

BACIX vs. DHIVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BACIX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than DHIVX's 1.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

BACIX vs. DHIVX - Dividend Comparison

BACIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, less than DHIVX's 3.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BACIX
BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund
2.19%2.79%2.63%3.39%2.49%2.67%3.66%3.06%3.43%2.76%2.38%2.51%
DHIVX
Centre Global Infrastructure Fund
3.55%3.66%2.54%1.60%1.85%1.70%2.43%2.31%2.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BACIX and DHIVX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BACIX has higher volatility (6.87%) compared to DHIVX (2.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BACIX dropped -77.81% vs DHIVX's -36.18%.

BACIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BACIX and DHIVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer