BACAX vs. WFSPX
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund (BACAX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (WFSPX).
BACAX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Feb 16, 2005. WFSPX is a passively managed fund by BlackRock that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Jul 30, 1993.
Performance
BACAX vs. WFSPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BACAX vs. WFSPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BACAX BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund | 35.80% | 10.53% | 3.78% | 2.61% | 43.02% | 42.93% | -29.68% | 12.64% | -19.98% | 2.07% |
WFSPX iShares S&P 500 Index Fund | -4.63% | 17.83% | 24.94% | 26.25% | -18.14% | 28.63% | 18.43% | 31.45% | -4.83% | 21.27% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BACAX achieves a 35.80% return, which is significantly higher than WFSPX's -4.63% return. Over the past 10 years, BACAX has underperformed WFSPX with an annualized return of 10.05%, while WFSPX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.92% annualized return.
BACAX
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 8.11%
- YTD
- 35.80%
- 6M
- 38.56%
- 1Y
- 37.54%
- 3Y*
- 18.29%
- 5Y*
- 21.83%
- 10Y*
- 10.05%
WFSPX
- 1D
- 2.62%
- 1M
- -5.31%
- YTD
- -4.63%
- 6M
- -2.47%
- 1Y
- 16.96%
- 3Y*
- 18.15%
- 5Y*
- 11.69%
- 10Y*
- 13.92%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BACAX vs. WFSPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BACAX has a 1.32% expense ratio, which is higher than WFSPX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BACAX vs. WFSPX — Risk / Return Rank
BACAX
WFSPX
BACAX vs. WFSPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund (BACAX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (WFSPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BACAX | WFSPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.80 | 0.96 | +0.83 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.18 | 1.47 | +0.71 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.22 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | 1.49 | +0.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.36 | 7.15 | +0.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BACAX | WFSPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.80 | 0.96 | +0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 | 0.70 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | 0.78 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.13 | +0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between BACAX and WFSPX is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
BACAX vs. WFSPX - Dividend Comparison
BACAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, more than WFSPX's 1.54% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BACAX BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund | 1.82% | 2.47% | 2.29% | 3.06% | 2.21% | 2.39% | 3.38% | 2.69% | 2.87% | 2.48% | 1.95% | 1.98% |
WFSPX iShares S&P 500 Index Fund | 1.54% | 1.72% | 1.41% | 1.50% | 2.02% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 1.99% | 2.00% | 1.62% | 2.37% | 2.49% |
Drawdowns
BACAX vs. WFSPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BACAX drawdown since its inception was -78.88%, which is greater than WFSPX's maximum drawdown of -58.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BACAX and WFSPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BACAX | WFSPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.88% | -58.21% | -20.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.54% | -12.11% | -5.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.74% | -24.51% | -1.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.92% | -33.74% | -32.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.84% | -6.51% | +5.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.51% | -12.84% | -21.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.26% | 2.53% | +2.73% |
Volatility
BACAX vs. WFSPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund (BACAX) is 4.19%, while iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (WFSPX) has a volatility of 5.17%. This indicates that BACAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WFSPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BACAX | WFSPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.19% | 5.17% | -0.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.43% | 9.44% | +1.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.56% | 18.21% | +3.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.63% | 16.88% | +6.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.17% | 18.00% | +9.17% |