BABU vs. NUGT
BABU (Direxion Daily BABA Bull 2X ETF) and NUGT (Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BABU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA), while NUGT is a Gold fund tracking the MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index (200%). Both are passively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BABU charges 0.97%/yr vs 1.13%/yr for NUGT.
Performance
BABU vs. NUGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BABU
- 1D
- -4.55%
- 1M
- -37.71%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NUGT
- 1D
- -9.53%
- 1M
- -19.60%
- YTD
- -32.09%
- 6M
- -39.03%
- 1Y
- 60.88%
- 3Y*
- 55.65%
- 5Y*
- 17.04%
- 10Y*
- -11.63%
BABU vs. NUGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BABU Direxion Daily BABA Bull 2X ETF | -64.16% |
NUGT Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF | -50.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between BABU and NUGT is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2026 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BABU vs. NUGT — Risk / Return Rank
BABU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NUGT
BABU vs. NUGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily BABA Bull 2X ETF (BABU) and Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (NUGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BABU | NUGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.18 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.96 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.30 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BABU vs. NUGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BABU drawdown since its inception was -64.16%, smaller than the maximum NUGT drawdown of -99.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABU and NUGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BABU | NUGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.16% | -99.97% | +35.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -63.43% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -63.43% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -73.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -96.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -64.16% | -99.84% | +35.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.68% | -91.53% | +53.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 26.52% | — |
Volatility
BABU vs. NUGT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BABU | NUGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 35.11% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 80.35% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 78.53% | 94.31% | -15.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 78.53% | 72.94% | +5.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 78.53% | 87.97% | -9.44% |
BABU vs. NUGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
BABU has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than NUGT's 1.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
BABU vs. NUGT - Dividend Comparison
BABU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, more than NUGT's 0.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BABU Direxion Daily BABA Bull 2X ETF | 1.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NUGT Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF | 0.44% | 0.22% | 1.79% | 1.67% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.63% | 0.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BABU and NUGT have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BABU is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BABU is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.13% for NUGT.
BABU has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.44% for NUGT.
BABU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while NUGT is Gold. BABU tracks Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA), while NUGT tracks MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index (200%). Their fees differ too: 0.97% for BABU and 1.13% for NUGT.
Find the right allocation for BABU and NUGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer