PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BABU vs. NUGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BABU vs. NUGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily BABA Bull 2X ETF (BABU) and Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X Shares (NUGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BABU

1D
-5.41%
1M
-11.25%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NUGT

1D
-6.64%
1M
-4.13%
YTD
-16.05%
6M
-6.29%
1Y
97.46%
3Y*
60.96%
5Y*
16.32%
10Y*
-8.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BABU vs. NUGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BABU and NUGT is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2026

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BABU vs. NUGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BABU

NUGT
NUGT Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
NUGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUGT Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
NUGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUGT Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BABU vs. NUGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily BABA Bull 2X ETF (BABU) and Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X Shares (NUGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BABU vs. NUGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BABUNUGTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.05

-0.33

-0.72

Drawdowns

BABU vs. NUGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BABU drawdown since its inception was -49.17%, smaller than the maximum NUGT drawdown of -99.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABU and NUGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BABUNUGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.17%

-99.97%

+50.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-44.84%

-99.80%

+54.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.05%

-91.52%

+56.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.39%

Volatility

BABU vs. NUGT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BABUNUGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

30.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

75.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

82.22%

90.01%

-7.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

82.22%

71.96%

+10.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

82.22%

87.90%

-5.68%

BABU vs. NUGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BABU has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than NUGT's 1.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

BABU vs. NUGT - Dividend Comparison

BABU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, which matches NUGT's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BABU
Direxion Daily BABA Bull 2X ETF
0.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NUGT
Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X Shares
0.36%0.22%1.79%1.67%0.70%0.00%0.00%0.63%0.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


BABU and NUGT have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BABU is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BABU is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.23% for NUGT.

BABU and NUGT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.36%.

BABU tracks Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA), while NUGT tracks NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 0.97% for BABU and 1.23% for NUGT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BABU and NUGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer